Suppr超能文献

美国麻醉医师协会身体状况分类分配的一致性评估

An assessment of the consistency of ASA physical status classification allocation.

作者信息

Haynes S R, Lawler P G

机构信息

Intensive Therapy Unit, South Cleveland Hospital, Middlesbrough.

出版信息

Anaesthesia. 1995 Mar;50(3):195-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1995.tb04554.x.

Abstract

The American Society of Anesthesiologists' (ASA) Physical Status Classification was tested for consistency of use by anaesthetists. A postal questionnaire was sent to 113 anaesthetists of varying experience working in the Northern Region of England. They were asked to allot ASA grades to 10 hypothetical patients. Ninety-seven (85.8%) responded to two mailings. In no case was there complete agreement on ASA grade, and in only one case were responses restricted to two of the five possible grades. In one case there was a significant difference in answers between anaesthetists with the FRCA (or equivalent) qualification, and those without. So much variation was observed between individual anaesthetist's assessments when describing common clinical problems that the ASA grade alone cannot be considered to satisfactorily describe the physical status of a patient.

摘要

对麻醉医生使用美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)身体状况分类的一致性进行了测试。向在英格兰北部地区工作的113名经验各异的麻醉医生发送了一份邮政调查问卷。要求他们为10名假设的患者分配ASA分级。经过两次邮寄,97人(85.8%)做出了回应。在任何情况下,对于ASA分级都没有完全一致的意见,只有一个案例中回答仅限于五个可能分级中的两个。在一个案例中,拥有皇家麻醉学院会员资格(或同等资格)的麻醉医生与没有该资格的麻醉医生之间的答案存在显著差异。在描述常见临床问题时,观察到个体麻醉医生的评估之间存在如此大的差异,以至于仅靠ASA分级不能被认为能令人满意地描述患者的身体状况。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验