• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

牵引式挂车司机的日程诱导服务时长及速度限制违规情况。

Schedule-induced hours-of-service and speed limit violations among tractor-trailer drivers.

作者信息

Beilock R

机构信息

University of Florida, Food & Resource Economics Department, Gainesville 32611, USA.

出版信息

Accid Anal Prev. 1995 Feb;27(1):33-42. doi: 10.1016/0001-4575(94)00042-k.

DOI:10.1016/0001-4575(94)00042-k
PMID:7718076
Abstract

Driver fatigue is well recognized as an important causational factor in accidents involving long-distance truck drivers. Drivers may drive while fatigued for a variety of reasons. Important among these is the assignment of difficult or unreasonable delivery schedules. Using self-reported data, the frequency of violation-inducing schedules is estimated during their ongoing movement for a sample of 498 long-distance drivers. Assuming average legal speed limits of 55 MPH, 26% of the drivers were found to have violation-inducing schedules. Solo drivers, drivers hauling refrigerated loads, regular route drivers, and those with longer current trip distances are the most likely to have such schedules. Also estimated were total weekly work hours. Assuming average attained travelling speeds of 50 MPH, the average driver drives 46 hours per week and works a total of 58 hours.

摘要

驾驶员疲劳被公认为是涉及长途卡车司机的事故中的一个重要成因。司机可能因各种原因在疲劳状态下驾驶。其中重要的原因是安排了困难或不合理的交货时间表。利用自我报告的数据,对498名长途司机样本在其行驶过程中违反规定的时间表的频率进行了估计。假设法定平均限速为每小时55英里,发现26%的司机有违反规定的时间表。单独驾驶的司机、运输冷藏货物的司机、固定路线的司机以及当前行程距离较长的司机最有可能有这样的时间表。还估计了每周的总工作小时数。假设平均行驶速度为每小时50英里,平均每位司机每周驾驶46小时,总共工作58小时。

相似文献

1
Schedule-induced hours-of-service and speed limit violations among tractor-trailer drivers.牵引式挂车司机的日程诱导服务时长及速度限制违规情况。
Accid Anal Prev. 1995 Feb;27(1):33-42. doi: 10.1016/0001-4575(94)00042-k.
2
Schedule tightness among tractor-trailer drivers.牵引式挂车司机的日程紧张程度。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2003 Jun;4(2):105-12. doi: 10.1080/15389580309869.
3
Hours of service violations among tractor-trailer drivers.牵引式挂车司机的服务时长违规情况。
Accid Anal Prev. 1991 Feb;23(1):29-36. doi: 10.1016/0001-4575(91)90032-z.
4
Long hours and fatigue: a survey of tractor-trailer drivers.长时间工作与疲劳:一项针对牵引式挂车司机的调查
J Public Health Policy. 1992 Autumn;13(3):341-66.
5
NIOSH national survey of long-haul truck drivers: Injury and safety.美国国家职业安全与健康研究所对长途卡车司机的全国性调查:伤害与安全
Accid Anal Prev. 2015 Dec;85:66-72. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2015.09.001. Epub 2015 Sep 19.
6
Truck driver reported unrealistically tight delivery schedules linked to their opinions of maximum speed limits and hours-of-service rules and their compliance with these safety laws and regulations.卡车司机报告称,交货时间表不切实际地紧张,这与他们对最高限速和服务时长规则的看法以及他们对这些安全法律法规的遵守情况有关。
Saf Sci. 2021 Jan;133. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2020.105003.
7
Effects of driver sleepiness and fatigue on violations among truck drivers in India.印度卡车司机的困倦和疲劳对违规行为的影响。
Int J Inj Contr Saf Promot. 2019 Dec;26(4):412-422. doi: 10.1080/17457300.2019.1660375. Epub 2019 Sep 2.
8
Work schedules of long-distance truck drivers before and after 2004 hours-of-service rule change.2004小时服务时长规定变更前后长途卡车司机的工作时间表。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2008;9(3):201-10. doi: 10.1080/15389580802040287.
9
The effect of external non-driving factors, payment type and waiting and queuing on fatigue in long distance trucking.外部非驾驶因素、付款方式和等待对长途卡车驾驶疲劳的影响。
Accid Anal Prev. 2013 Sep;58:26-34. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2013.04.017. Epub 2013 Apr 24.
10
Fatal crash between a car operating with automated control systems and a tractor-semitrailer truck.一辆配备自动控制系统的汽车与一辆半挂牵引车发生致命碰撞。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2018;19(sup2):S153-S156. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2018.1532211.

引用本文的文献

1
Working conditions and fatigue in professional truck drivers at Israeli ports.以色列港口职业卡车司机的工作条件与疲劳状况
Inj Prev. 2005 Apr;11(2):110-4. doi: 10.1136/ip.2004.007682.