Suppr超能文献

峰值速度高估与线性阵列频谱多普勒

Peak velocity overestimation and linear-array spectral Doppler.

作者信息

Eicke B M, Kremkau F W, Hinson H, Tegeler C H

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Bowman Gray School of Medicine, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.

出版信息

J Neuroimaging. 1995 Apr;5(2):115-21. doi: 10.1111/jon199552115.

Abstract

Ultrasound instruments are used to evaluate blood flow velocities in the human body. Most clinical instruments perform velocity calculations based on the Doppler principle and measure the frequency shift of a reflected ultrasound beam. Doppler-only instruments use single-frequency, single-crystal transducers. Linear- and annular-array multiple-crystal transducers are used for duplex scanning (simultaneous B-mode image and Doppler). Clinical interpretation relies primarily on determination of peak velocities or frequency shifts as identified by the Doppler spectrum. Understanding of the validity of these measurements is important for instruments in clinical use. The present study examined the accuracy with which several ultrasound instruments could estimate velocities based on the identification of the peak of the Doppler spectrum, across a range of different angles of insonation, on a Doppler string phantom. The string was running in a water tank at constant speeds of 50, 100, and 150 cm/sec and also in a sine wave pattern at 100- or 150-cm/sec amplitude. Angles of insonation were 30, 45, 60, and 70 degrees. The single-frequency, single-crystal transducers (PC Dop 842, 2-MHz pulsed-wave, 4-MHz continuous-wave) provided acceptably accurate velocity estimates at all tested velocities independent of the angle of insonation. All duplex Doppler instruments with linear-array transducers (Philips P700, 5.0-MHz; Hewlett-Packard Sonos 1000, 7.5-MHz; ATL Ultramark 9 HDI, 7.5-MHz) exhibited a consistent overestimation of the true flow velocity due to increasing intrinsic spectral broadening with increasing angle of insonation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

超声仪器用于评估人体中的血流速度。大多数临床仪器基于多普勒原理进行速度计算,并测量反射超声束的频移。仅使用多普勒的仪器采用单频、单晶换能器。线性和环形阵列多晶换能器用于双功扫描(同时进行B模式成像和多普勒检查)。临床解读主要依赖于确定多普勒频谱所识别的峰值速度或频移。了解这些测量的有效性对于临床使用的仪器很重要。本研究在多普勒弦线体模上,检查了几种超声仪器在一系列不同的入射角度下,基于多普勒频谱峰值识别来估计速度的准确性。弦线在水箱中以50、100和150厘米/秒的恒定速度运行,也以100厘米/秒或150厘米/秒振幅的正弦波模式运行。入射角度为30、45、60和70度。单频、单晶换能器(PC Dop 842,2兆赫脉冲波,4兆赫连续波)在所有测试速度下,无论入射角度如何,都能提供可接受的准确速度估计。所有带线性阵列换能器的双功多普勒仪器(飞利浦P700,5.0兆赫;惠普Sonos 1000,7.5兆赫;ATL Ultramark 9 HDI,7.5兆赫),由于随着入射角度增加,固有频谱展宽增加,均表现出对真实流速的一致高估。(摘要截短于250字)

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验