• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[养蚕工人职业性哮喘及特异性IgE的研究]

[A study of occupational asthma and specific IgE in sericulture workers].

作者信息

Wang X, Zheng S, Zhang H

机构信息

Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, CAMS, Beijing.

出版信息

Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao. 1994 Oct;16(5):323-7.

PMID:7720120
Abstract

Clinical investigation revealed that 75.6% (68/90) of sericulture workers examined had allergic respiratory symptoms. Of the 90 workers, 14 (15.6%) suffered from occupational asthma. Work-related allergens including silkworm cocoon (SC), silkworm urine (SU), moth excrete (ME) and moth scales (MS) were collected and prepared. Serum specific IgE levels were detected by ELISA. The results showed that the level of sIgE in asthmatic workers was significantly higher than that in the "common symptom" group, asymptomatic group and control group. No significant difference in total IgE was found between the workers and controls. The anti-SU-sIgE positive rate was significantly higher than those of sIgE to the other three allergens. These results indicate that the high levels of sIgE are responsible for occupational asthma in sericulture workers and that SU is an important allergen in these patients.

摘要

临床调查显示,接受检查的养蚕工人中有75.6%(68/90)出现过敏性呼吸道症状。在这90名工人中,14人(15.6%)患有职业性哮喘。收集并制备了与工作相关的过敏原,包括蚕茧(SC)、蚕尿(SU)、蛾排泄物(ME)和蛾鳞片(MS)。采用酶联免疫吸附测定法检测血清特异性IgE水平。结果显示,哮喘工人的sIgE水平显著高于“常见症状”组、无症状组和对照组。工人与对照组之间的总IgE未发现显著差异。抗SU-sIgE阳性率显著高于针对其他三种过敏原的sIgE阳性率。这些结果表明,sIgE水平升高是养蚕工人职业性哮喘的原因,且SU是这些患者的重要过敏原。

相似文献

1
[A study of occupational asthma and specific IgE in sericulture workers].[养蚕工人职业性哮喘及特异性IgE的研究]
Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao. 1994 Oct;16(5):323-7.
2
Sensitization to Empynase(pronase B) in exposed hospital personnel and identification of the Empynase allergen.医院接触人员对链霉蛋白酶(链霉蛋白酶B)的致敏作用及链霉蛋白酶过敏原的鉴定
Clin Exp Allergy. 2006 Mar;36(3):352-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2006.02434.x.
3
[Diagnostic significance of serum allergen detection in diagnosis of allergic rhinitis and bronchial asthma].[血清过敏原检测在变应性鼻炎和支气管哮喘诊断中的诊断意义]
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2008 Dec 30;88(48):3422-4.
4
Mouse allergen-specific immunoglobulin G and immunoglobulin G4 and allergic symptoms in immunoglobulin E-sensitized laboratory animal workers.免疫球蛋白E致敏的实验动物工作人员体内的小鼠过敏原特异性免疫球蛋白G和免疫球蛋白G4及过敏症状
Clin Exp Allergy. 2005 Oct;35(10):1347-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2005.02331.x.
5
[A preliminary study on determining total serum IgE and specific anti-mite IgE antibody in cigarette manufacturing workers].[卷烟制造工人血清总IgE及特异性抗螨IgE抗体测定的初步研究]
Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi. 1989 Jun;12(3):153-4, 191.
6
Identification of wheat gliadins as an allergen family related to baker's asthma.鉴定小麦醇溶蛋白为与面包师哮喘相关的一个过敏原家族。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2008 Mar;121(3):744-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2007.09.051. Epub 2007 Nov 26.
7
Seroimmunological characteristics of Korean workers exposed to toluene diisocyanate.接触甲苯二异氰酸酯的韩国工人的血清免疫学特征。
Environ Res. 1997 Oct;75(1):1-6. doi: 10.1006/enrs.1997.3763.
8
The predictive value of IgE as biomarker in asthma.IgE作为哮喘生物标志物的预测价值。
J Asthma. 2008 Oct;45(8):654-63. doi: 10.1080/02770900802126958.
9
Prevalence of work-related symptoms and serum-specific antibodies to wheat flour in exposed workers in the bakery industry.烘焙行业接触面粉工人的工作相关症状及血清小麦粉特异性抗体的患病率
Respir Med. 2008 Apr;102(4):548-55. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2007.11.015. Epub 2007 Dec 31.
10
Occupational allergy in laboratory workers caused by the African migratory grasshopper Locusta migratoria.由非洲迁徙蝗虫飞蝗引起的实验室工作人员职业性过敏。
Allergy. 2005 Feb;60(2):200-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2005.00661.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Common environmental allergens causing respiratory allergy in India.在印度引发呼吸道过敏的常见环境过敏原。
Indian J Pediatr. 2002 Mar;69(3):245-50. doi: 10.1007/BF02734234.