Suppr超能文献

脊柱转移瘤的磁共振成像评估:T1加权、短反转时间反转恢复、快速自旋回波及反转恢复快速自旋回波序列

MR evaluation of vertebral metastases: T1-weighted, short-inversion-time inversion recovery, fast spin-echo, and inversion-recovery fast spin-echo sequences.

作者信息

Mehta R C, Marks M P, Hinks R S, Glover G H, Enzmann D R

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Stanford University Medical Center, CA 94305-5105, USA.

出版信息

AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1995 Feb;16(2):281-8.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the detectability of vertebral metastatic disease on T1-weighted, short-inversion-time inversion recovery (STIR), fast spin-echo (FSE), fat-saturated FSE, and inversion recovery FSE (IRFSE) MR sequences using percent contrast and contrast-to-noise ratios.

METHODS

Patients with proved metastatic disease underwent imaging on a 1.5-T MR system with sagittal T1-weighted (800/20/2 [repetition time/echo time/excitations]) (91 patients), STIR (1400/43/2; inversion time, 140) (91 patients), FSE (4000/180/2) (46 patients), fat-saturated FSE (4000/180/2) (16 patients), and IRFSE (29 patients) sequences. Percent contrast and contrast-to-noise ratio were calculated for the lesions. The number of metastatic lesions detected with each of the pulse sequences was also calculated.

RESULTS

Mean percent contrast was, for T1-weighted sequence, -42.2 +/- 1%; STIR, 262 +/- 34%; FSE, 121 +/- 21%; fat-saturated FSE, 182 +/- 6%; and IRFSE, 272 +/- 47%. The mean contrast-to-noise ratio for T1-weighted was -4.63 +/- 1.7; STIR, 10.8 +/- .98; FSE, 4.16 +/- .76; fat-saturated FSE, 4.87 +/- .19; and IRFSE, 5.2 +/- .87. STIR and IRFSE showed the highest number of lesions, followed by T1-weighted, fat-saturated FSE, and FSE sequences. T1-weighted sequences showed 94%, FSE 55%, and fat-saturated FSE 78% of the lesions detected. Epidural metastatic lesions were better depicted on T1-weighted, FSE, and fat-saturated FSE sequences.

CONCLUSION

STIR was superior to both T1-weighted and FSE (with and without fat saturation) for detection of metastatic lesions, in terms of both percent contrast and contrast-to-noise ratio and visibility. IRFSE was equal to STIR for the detection of metastasis by both subjective and objective criteria. T1-weighted, FSE, and fat-saturated FSE sequences were superior to STIR and IRFSE in the detection of epidural metastatic disease. IRFSE provided faster scanning time, which could be translated into greater resolution.

摘要

目的

使用对比百分比和对比噪声比,比较T1加权、短反转时间反转恢复(STIR)、快速自旋回波(FSE)、脂肪饱和FSE及反转恢复FSE(IRFSE)磁共振序列对椎体转移瘤的检测能力。

方法

对已确诊为转移瘤的患者,使用1.5-T磁共振系统进行矢状面T1加权(800/20/2[重复时间/回波时间/激励次数])(91例患者)、STIR(1400/43/2;反转时间,140)(91例患者)、FSE(4000/180/2)(46例患者)、脂肪饱和FSE(4000/180/2)(16例患者)及IRFSE(29例患者)序列成像。计算病变的对比百分比和对比噪声比。还计算了每个脉冲序列检测到的转移瘤数量。

结果

T1加权序列的平均对比百分比为-42.2±1%;STIR为262±34%;FSE为121±21%;脂肪饱和FSE为182±6%;IRFSE为272±47%。T1加权的平均对比噪声比为-4.63±1.7;STIR为10.8±0.98;FSE为4.16±0.76;脂肪饱和FSE为4.87±0.19;IRFSE为5.2±0.87。STIR和IRFSE显示的病变数量最多,其次是T1加权、脂肪饱和FSE和FSE序列。T1加权序列检测到的病变占94%,FSE为55%,脂肪饱和FSE为78%。硬膜外转移瘤在T1加权、FSE和脂肪饱和FSE序列上显示更佳。

结论

就对比百分比、对比噪声比及可见度而言,STIR在检测转移瘤方面优于T1加权和FSE(无论有无脂肪饱和)。根据主观和客观标准,IRFSE在检测转移瘤方面与STIR相当。T1加权、FSE和脂肪饱和FSE序列在检测硬膜外转移瘤方面优于STIR和IRFSE。IRFSE扫描时间更快,可转化为更高的分辨率。

相似文献

4
Inversion-recovery fast spin-echo MR imaging: efficacy in the evaluation of head and neck lesions.
Radiology. 1993 May;187(2):421-6. doi: 10.1148/radiology.187.2.8475284.

引用本文的文献

1
Axial Axis Metastasis.轴位转移
Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo). 2023 Mar 24;58(1):9-18. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1756158. eCollection 2023 Feb.
10
[Whole-body MRI and PET/CT in tumor diagnosis].
Radiologe. 2004 Nov;44(11):1079-87. doi: 10.1007/s00117-004-1128-3.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验