• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

左主干冠状动脉疾病患者手术组与内科治疗组生存率的比较。冠状动脉搭桥手术长期临床研究(CASS)经验。

Comparison of surgical and medical group survival in patients with left main coronary artery disease. Long-term CASS experience.

作者信息

Caracciolo E A, Davis K B, Sopko G, Kaiser G C, Corley S D, Schaff H, Taylor H A, Chaitman B R

机构信息

St Louis (Mo) University Health Sciences Center, USA.

出版信息

Circulation. 1995 May 1;91(9):2325-34. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.91.9.2325.

DOI:10.1161/01.cir.91.9.2325
PMID:7729018
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Observational and randomized studies designed to compare surgical and medical therapies in patients with left main coronary artery disease (LMCD) have shown that coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery prolongs life in most patients with LMCD. The present report of 1484 patients with LMCD in the Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS) Registry extends the originally published 5-year surgical and medical group survival analysis to more than 16 years of follow-up and permits analysis of LMCD patient subgroups.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The CASS Registry contains 1484 patients with > or = 50% left main coronary artery stenosis initially treated with either surgical or nonsurgical therapy. The 15-year cumulative survival estimates were 37% for the 1153 patients in the surgical group compared with 27% for the 331 patients in the medical group. Median survival in the surgical group was 13.3 years (12.8 to 13.8 years, 95% confidence limits) compared with only 6.6 years (5.4 to 7.9 years) in the medical group (difference, 6.7 years; P < .0001). Median survival was also significantly longer in the surgical group stratified by age, sex, anginal class, left ventricular (LV) function, coronary anatomy, and the extent of LMCD. However, CABG surgery did not significantly prolong median survival in patient subgroups with (1) left main coronary stenosis of 50% to 59%; (2) normal LV systolic function; (3) normal or mildly abnormal LV systolic function and a right coronary artery stenosis > or = 70%; and (4) a nonstenotic (< or = 70%) right coronary artery. The 15-year cumulative survival for patients with normal LV systolic function in the surgical and medical groups was 42% and 51%, respectively. Median survival was 14.7 years in the surgical group and > 15 years in the medical group (P = NS). In patients with normal LV systolic function and a right coronary artery stenosis > or = 70%, the 15-year cumulative survival rates were also similar in the surgical and medical groups (40% and 48%, respectively). Median survival was 14.3 years in the surgical group and 14.2 years in the medical group (P = NS). The 15-year cumulative survival estimates for all subgroups were affected by convergence of the surgical and medical survival group curves owing to a disproportionate increase in the late surgical group mortality. Overall, 25% of patients in the medical group ultimately underwent CABG surgery. If all medical group patients had survived long enough, about 47% would be estimated to have had surgery by 15 years.

CONCLUSIONS

This report, which extends follow-up of more than 16 years in CASS Registry patients with LMCD, shows that CABG surgery prolongs life in most clinical and angiographic subgroups. However, median survival was not prolonged by CABG surgery in patients with normal LV systolic function, even if a significant right coronary artery stenosis (> or = 70%) also was present. These results extend our understanding of the natural history of LMCD and permit a more accurate estimate of long-term surgical and medical group survival.

摘要

背景

旨在比较左主干冠状动脉疾病(LMCD)患者手术治疗和药物治疗的观察性研究及随机研究表明,冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)能延长大多数LMCD患者的生命。冠状动脉手术研究(CASS)注册中心对1484例LMCD患者的本报告将最初发表的手术组和药物组5年生存分析扩展至超过16年的随访,并允许对LMCD患者亚组进行分析。

方法与结果

CASS注册中心包含1484例左主干冠状动脉狭窄≥50%且最初接受手术或非手术治疗的患者。手术组1153例患者的15年累积生存率估计为37%,而药物组331例患者为27%。手术组的中位生存期为13.3年(12.8至13.8年,95%置信区间),而药物组仅为6.6年(5.4至7.9年)(差异为6.7年;P<0.0001)。按年龄、性别、心绞痛分级、左心室(LV)功能、冠状动脉解剖结构和LMCD程度分层后,手术组的中位生存期也显著更长。然而,CABG手术并未显著延长以下患者亚组的中位生存期:(1)左主干冠状动脉狭窄50%至59%;(2)左心室收缩功能正常;(3)左心室收缩功能正常或轻度异常且右冠状动脉狭窄≥70%;(4)右冠状动脉无狭窄(≤70%)。手术组和药物组左心室收缩功能正常患者的15年累积生存率分别为42%和51%。手术组的中位生存期为14.7年,药物组>15年(P=无显著性差异)。在左心室收缩功能正常且右冠状动脉狭窄≥70%的患者中,手术组和药物组的15年累积生存率也相似(分别为40%和48%)。手术组的中位生存期为14.3年,药物组为14.2年(P=无显著性差异)。由于手术组晚期死亡率不成比例增加,手术组和药物组生存曲线的趋同影响了所有亚组的15年累积生存率估计。总体而言,药物组25%的患者最终接受了CABG手术。如果所有药物组患者存活时间足够长,估计到15年时约47%的患者会接受手术。结论:本报告对CASS注册中心的LMCD患者进行了超过16年的随访,表明CABG手术能延长大多数临床和血管造影亚组患者的生命。然而,即使存在显著的右冠状动脉狭窄(≥70%),CABG手术也未延长左心室收缩功能正常患者的中位生存期。这些结果扩展了我们对LMCD自然病史的理解,并允许更准确地估计手术组和药物组的长期生存率。

相似文献

1
Comparison of surgical and medical group survival in patients with left main coronary artery disease. Long-term CASS experience.左主干冠状动脉疾病患者手术组与内科治疗组生存率的比较。冠状动脉搭桥手术长期临床研究(CASS)经验。
Circulation. 1995 May 1;91(9):2325-34. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.91.9.2325.
2
Comparison of surgical and medical group survival in patients with left main equivalent coronary artery disease. Long-term CASS experience.左主干等效冠状动脉疾病患者手术组与药物治疗组生存率的比较。冠心病外科研究(CASS)长期经验。
Circulation. 1995 May 1;91(9):2335-44. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.91.9.2335.
3
Effect of coronary bypass surgery on survival patterns in subsets of patients with left main coronary artery disease. Report of the Collaborative Study in Coronary Artery Surgery (CASS).冠状动脉搭桥手术对左主干冠状动脉疾病患者亚组生存模式的影响。冠状动脉搭桥手术协作研究(CASS)报告。
Am J Cardiol. 1981 Oct;48(4):765-77. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(81)90156-9.
4
Surgical survival in the Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS) registry.冠状动脉外科研究(CASS)登记处的手术生存率。
Ann Thorac Surg. 1985 Sep;40(3):245-60. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(10)60037-9.
5
[Comparison of the cumulative survival among patient groups with a left main coronary artery lesion after surgical and therapeutic treatment].
Kardiologiia. 1982 Feb;22(2):53-7.
6
Comparison of 15-year survival for men and women after initial medical or surgical treatment for coronary artery disease: a CASS registry study. Coronary Artery Surgery Study.冠心病初次接受药物或手术治疗后男性与女性15年生存率的比较:一项CASS注册研究。冠状动脉外科研究。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995 Apr;25(5):1000-9. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(94)00518-u.
7
Medical versus early surgical therapy in patients with triple-vessel disease and mild angina pectoris: a CASS registry study of survival.
Ann Thorac Surg. 1987 Nov;44(5):471-86. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(10)62104-2.
8
Long-term survival of medically treated patients in the Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS) Registry.冠状动脉手术研究(CASS)登记处接受药物治疗患者的长期生存情况。
Circulation. 1994 Dec;90(6):2645-57. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.90.6.2645.
9
Multivariate discriminant analysis of the clinical and angiographic predictors of operative mortality from the Collaborative Study in Coronary Artery Surgery (CASS).冠状动脉外科合作研究(CASS)中手术死亡率的临床和血管造影预测因素的多变量判别分析。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1980 Dec;80(6):876-87.
10
Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS): comparability of 10 year survival in randomized and randomizable patients.冠状动脉手术研究(CASS):随机分组和可随机分组患者10年生存率的可比性
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1990 Nov;16(5):1071-8. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(90)90534-v.

引用本文的文献

1
Revascularization strategy for left main coronary artery disease comparing percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting.比较经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗左主干冠状动脉疾病的血运重建策略
Commun Med (Lond). 2025 Sep 29;5(1):402. doi: 10.1038/s43856-025-01098-w.
2
State-of-the-art percutaneous coronary intervention for left main coronary artery disease in Japan.日本左主干冠状动脉疾病的最新经皮冠状动脉介入治疗
Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2024 Oct;39(4):386-402. doi: 10.1007/s12928-024-01030-4. Epub 2024 Jul 30.
3
Left Main Coronary Artery Calcium and Diabetes Confer Very-High-Risk Equivalence in Coronary Artery Calcium >1,000.
左主干冠状动脉钙和糖尿病在冠状动脉钙>1000 时具有极高的风险等效性。
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2024 Jul;17(7):766-776. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2023.12.006. Epub 2024 Feb 21.
4
Percutaneous Treatment of Left Main Disease: A Review of Current Status.经皮治疗左主干病变:现状综述
J Clin Med. 2023 Jul 28;12(15):4972. doi: 10.3390/jcm12154972.
5
Towards a common pathway for the treatment of left main disease: contemporary evidence and future directions: Left main disease treatment.走向左主干病变治疗的共同路径:当代证据与未来方向:左主干病变治疗
AsiaIntervention. 2021 Dec;7(2):85-95. doi: 10.4244/AIJ-D-21-00022.
6
Twelve-year outcomes after revascularization for ostial/shaft lesions in unprotected left main coronary artery.非保护左主干冠状动脉开口/主干病变血运重建术后12年的转归
J Geriatr Cardiol. 2020 Jun;17(6):338-343. doi: 10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2020.06.004.
7
Prognosis of Percutaneous Intervention of a Left Main Coronary Artery Stenosis Without the Use of Intravascular Imaging.不使用血管内成像技术对左主干冠状动脉狭窄进行经皮介入治疗的预后
Cureus. 2018 Jun 22;10(6):e2857. doi: 10.7759/cureus.2857.
8
Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Versus Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Unprotected Left Main Disease - A Review.冠状动脉搭桥术与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗无保护左主干疾病的综述
Interv Cardiol. 2013 Mar;8(1):14-18. doi: 10.15420/icr.2013.8.1.14.
9
Percutaneous coronary intervention using drug-eluting stents versus coronary artery bypass graft surgery in left main coronary artery disease an updated meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.药物洗脱支架经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗左主干冠状动脉疾病的比较:随机临床试验的最新荟萃分析
Oncotarget. 2017 Aug 10;8(39):66449-66457. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.20142. eCollection 2017 Sep 12.
10
Impact of left main coronary artery disease on long-term mortality in patients undergoing drug-eluting stent implantation.左主干冠状动脉疾病对行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者长期死亡率的影响。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2017 Dec;106(12):953-959. doi: 10.1007/s00392-017-1145-7. Epub 2017 Aug 3.