Suppr超能文献

胎儿监护——助产士的态度

Fetal monitoring--midwifery attitudes.

作者信息

Dover S L, Gauge S M

出版信息

Midwifery. 1995 Mar;11(1):18-27. doi: 10.1016/0266-6138(95)90053-5.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

to survey midwives' attitudes and practices related to intrapartum fetal monitoring.

DESIGN

descriptive correlational study.

SETTING

regional and district maternity unit and related community area within one health authority.

PARTICIPANTS

all midwives were invited to participate. Two hundred and forty two questionnaires were administered and 117 were returned (48% response rate).

MEASUREMENTS AND FINDINGS

in the questionnaire information was collected on professional/demographic details, education and practices related to intrapartum fetal monitoring, together with a 20-item attitude scale which encompassed attitudes towards fetal monitoring and related issues. As expected, the findings suggest that midwives' preferred methods of fetal monitoring varied with the client's risk category. However, midwife preference did not necessarily match actual choice of method. There are many factors influencing choice, not least of which is confidence in ability. Significant differences were found between midwives.

KEY CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

the findings highlight some of the issues relating to individual confidence. 97% of the midwives felt they would benefit from in-service training in CTG interpretation. The findings support the development of continuing in service education programmes for midwives.

摘要

目的

调查助产士与产时胎儿监护相关的态度和做法。

设计

描述性相关性研究。

地点

一个卫生当局辖区内的地区和区级产科单位及相关社区区域。

参与者

邀请了所有助产士参与。发放了242份问卷,回收117份(回复率48%)。

测量与结果

问卷收集了专业/人口统计学细节、与产时胎儿监护相关的教育和做法等信息,以及一个包含对胎儿监护及相关问题态度的20项态度量表。正如预期的那样,结果表明助产士首选的胎儿监护方法因产妇风险类别而异。然而,助产士的偏好不一定与实际采用的方法相符。影响选择的因素众多,其中能力信心是重要因素之一。助产士之间存在显著差异。

关键结论及对实践的启示

研究结果突出了一些与个人信心相关的问题。97%的助产士认为她们将从CTG解读的在职培训中受益。研究结果支持为助产士开展持续在职教育项目。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验