• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

The Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale. Measurement properties.

作者信息

Kopec J A, Esdaile J M, Abrahamowicz M, Abenhaim L, Wood-Dauphinee S, Lamping D L, Williams J I

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Montreal General Hospital, McGill University, Canada.

出版信息

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1995 Feb 1;20(3):341-52. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199502000-00016.

DOI:10.1097/00007632-199502000-00016
PMID:7732471
Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

The Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale is a 20-item self-administered instrument designed to assess the level of functional disability in individuals with back pain. The scale was administered as part of a larger questionnaire to a group of 242 back pain patients. Follow-up data were obtained after several days and after 2 to 6 months.

OBJECTIVES

The goal of this study was to determine whether the Quebec scale is a reliable, valid, and responsive measure of disability in back pain, and to compare it with other disability scales.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

A number of functional disability scales for back pain are being used, but their conceptual validity is uncertain. Unlike most published instruments, the Quebec scale was constructed using a conceptual approach to disability assessment and empirical methods of item development, analysis, and selection.

METHODS

The authors calculated test-retest and internal consistency coefficients, evaluated construct validity of the scale, and tested its responsiveness against a global index of change. Direct comparisons with the Roland, Oswestry, and SF-36 scales were carried out.

RESULTS

Test-retest reliability was 0.92, and Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.96. The scale correlated as expected with other measures of disability, pain, medical history, and utilization variables, work-related variables, and socio-demographic characteristics. Significant changes in disability over time, and differences in change scores between patients that were expected to differ in the direction of change, were found.

CONCLUSIONS

The Quebec scale can be recommended as an outcome measure in clinical trials, and for monitoring the progress of individual patients participating in treatment or rehabilitation programs.

摘要

相似文献

1
The Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale. Measurement properties.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1995 Feb 1;20(3):341-52. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199502000-00016.
2
A comparison of five low back disability questionnaires: reliability and responsiveness.五种下背部功能障碍问卷的比较:可靠性与反应性
Phys Ther. 2002 Jan;82(1):8-24. doi: 10.1093/ptj/82.1.8.
3
Transcultural adaptation and validation of Hindi version of Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale.魁北克背痛残疾量表印地语版本的跨文化适应与验证
Disabil Rehabil. 2018 Dec;40(24):2938-2945. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2017.1362596. Epub 2017 Aug 7.
4
The Italian version of the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale: cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity in patients with chronic low back pain.魁北克腰痛残疾量表的意大利版本:在慢性腰痛患者中的跨文化适应性、信度和效度。
Eur Spine J. 2020 Mar;29(3):530-539. doi: 10.1007/s00586-019-06153-4. Epub 2019 Sep 26.
5
Validation of the Turkish version of the Quebec back pain disability scale for patients with low back pain.针对腰痛患者的魁北克腰痛残疾量表土耳其语版本的验证
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Mar 15;34(6):E219-24. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181971e2d.
6
The Oswestry Disability Index, the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire, and the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale: translation and validation studies of the Iranian versions.奥斯威斯瑞残疾指数、罗兰-莫里斯残疾问卷及魁北克背痛残疾量表:伊朗版本的翻译与验证研究
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Jun 15;31(14):E454-9. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000222141.61424.f7.
7
The pain disability questionnaire: a new psychometrically sound measure for chronic musculoskeletal disorders.疼痛残疾问卷:一种用于慢性肌肉骨骼疾病的新的心理测量学上可靠的测量工具。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004 Oct 15;29(20):2290-302; discussion 2303. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000142221.88111.0f.
8
The functional rating index: reliability and validity of the Persian language version in patients with low back pain.功能评定指数:在腰痛患者中评估波斯语版本的可靠性和有效性。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Nov 15;36(24):E1573-7. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182103282.
9
Reliability, Validity, and Cross-Cultural Adaptation of the Turkish Version of the Bournemouth Questionnaire.《伯恩茅斯问卷土耳其语版的信度、效度及跨文化适应性》
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016 Nov 1;41(21):E1292-E1297. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001599.
10
Validation of the Arabic version of the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale.魁北克腰痛残疾量表阿拉伯语版的验证。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Dec 15;37(26):E1645-50. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182765a3f.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and evaluation of the low back pain questionnaire for personnel working on islands.岛屿工作人员腰痛问卷的编制与评价
Front Public Health. 2025 Aug 19;13:1655747. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1655747. eCollection 2025.
2
Low Back Pain in South African Adolescent Field Hockey Players: Implications for Future Practice.南非青少年曲棍球运动员的下背痛:对未来实践的启示。
J Clin Med. 2025 May 9;14(10):3309. doi: 10.3390/jcm14103309.
3
Effects of Individual Psychological Factors and Cumulative Psychological Distress on Prospective Pain Quality in Older Adults With Chronic Low Back Pain.
个体心理因素和累积心理困扰对慢性下腰痛老年人预期疼痛质量的影响。
Clin J Pain. 2025 Jul 1;41(7):e1294. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000001294.
4
Effectiveness rehabilitative therapy and Pridinol Mesylate in low back pain.康复治疗与甲磺酸普立地诺治疗腰痛的有效性。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Jan 22;11:1470996. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1470996. eCollection 2024.
5
Response to functional restoration in non-specific chronic low back pain with Modic type 1 changes.伴有Modic 1型改变的非特异性慢性下腰痛对功能恢复的反应
Eur Spine J. 2025 Mar;34(3):1095-1106. doi: 10.1007/s00586-025-08665-8. Epub 2025 Jan 24.
6
Evaluating the Efficacy of Capacitive Resistive Monopolar Radiofrequency Combined With Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation in Managing Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomised Controlled Trial.评估电容电阻单极射频联合本体感觉神经肌肉促进治疗慢性下腰痛的疗效:一项随机对照试验。
Physiother Res Int. 2025 Jan;30(1):e70009. doi: 10.1002/pri.70009.
7
Low back pain in beauty salons professionals in the city of Fortaleza-CE.在塞阿拉州福塔雷萨市的美容院专业人员中的腰痛问题。
Rev Bras Med Trab. 2024 Sep 24;22(2):e20231064. doi: 10.47626/1679-4435-2023-1064. eCollection 2024 Apr-Jun.
8
The Functional Efficiency of Older Patients after Lumbar Spine Surgery, the Impact of Pain, and the Passage of Time: Tips for Care Providers.老年患者腰椎手术后的功能效率、疼痛影响及时间推移:给护理人员的建议
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Aug 23;12(17):1684. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12171684.
9
Prospective comparative analysis of three types of decompressive surgery for lumbar central stenosis: conventional, full-endoscopic, and biportal endoscopic laminectomy.前瞻性对比分析三种减压手术治疗腰椎中央狭窄症:传统、全内镜和双通道内镜椎板切除术。
Sci Rep. 2024 Aug 27;14(1):19853. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-65923-3.
10
Changes in isokinetic trunk muscle strength and endurance after two different restoration programs in people with chronic low back pain: A longitudinal retrospective study.慢性下腰痛患者在两种不同康复方案后的等速躯干肌力和耐力变化:一项纵向回顾性研究。
Heliyon. 2024 Jul 20;10(15):e34914. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34914. eCollection 2024 Aug 15.