Erny K, Pallister J, Sheppard M
ISREC, Epalinges, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Arch Virol. 1995;140(3):491-501. doi: 10.1007/BF01718426.
Some discussion has centered on whether fowl adenovirus (FAV) serotypes 4 and 10 are distinct serotypes or in fact should be reclassified as a single serotype. We have undertaken a detailed characterisation of representatives of both serotypes in order to determine if types 4 and 10 should be grouped together or retained as distinct serotypes. Examination at the genomic level has revealed considerable similarities and few differences between these 2 serotypes. DNA cross-hybridization failed to distinguish between them and restriction enzyme analysis demonstrated limited sequence differences. In vivo studies demonstrated the cross-protection afforded by a natural route vaccination with serotype 4 FAV when chickens were challenged with serotype 10 FAV. On the basis of these studies it is suggested that these FAV serotypes be combined in future FAV classification. Physical maps for both serotype 4 and 10 have been constructed using the restriction enzymes Hpa I, Dra I, Nde I, Xba I and Not I for both serotypes and in addition Eco RI, Sfi I, Sma I and BglII for serotype 10.
一些讨论集中在禽腺病毒(FAV)4型和10型是不同的血清型,还是实际上应重新分类为单一血清型。我们对这两种血清型的代表进行了详细的特征描述,以确定4型和10型是应归为一类还是保留为不同的血清型。基因组水平的检测显示这两种血清型之间有相当多的相似之处,差异很少。DNA交叉杂交无法区分它们,限制性酶切分析显示序列差异有限。体内研究表明,当用10型FAV攻击鸡时,4型FAV自然途径接种所提供的交叉保护作用。基于这些研究,建议在未来的FAV分类中将这些FAV血清型合并。使用限制性酶Hpa I、Dra I、Nde I、Xba I和Not I构建了4型和10型的物理图谱,对于10型还使用了Eco RI、Sfi I、Sma I和BglII。