Busch H P
Krankenhaus der Barmherzigen Brüder, Trier, Germany.
J Digit Imaging. 1995 Feb;8(1 Suppl 1):8-10. doi: 10.1007/BF03168058.
In evaluating the image quality of the chest, four different analog and digital methods were compared. For peripheral lung field, the advanced multiple beam equalization radiography (AMBER) system was given the best score, followed in order by the storage-phosphor, conventional, and asymmetric film/screen systems. For the mediastinal field, the highest image quality was given to the AMBER system, followed by storage phosphor and asymmetric film/screen system. The best overall image quality, especially with regard to demonstration of pathologic alteration, was given to the AMBER system, followed by the storage-phosphor, conventional, and asymmetric film/screen radiography systems. In conclusion, AMBER demonstrated the highest image quality. The storage-phosphor system provided better results in the peripheral and mediastinal fields in comparison with conventional film/screen systems. Other digital systems including selenium chest radiography system and image intensifier digital radiography were also discussed.
在评估胸部图像质量时，比较了四种不同的模拟和数字方法。对于外周肺野，先进的多束均衡射线照相术（AMBER）系统得分最高，其次依次是存储磷光体、传统和非对称胶片/屏系统。对于纵隔野，AMBER系统的图像质量最高，其次是存储磷光体和非对称胶片/屏系统。总体图像质量最佳，尤其是在显示病理改变方面，AMBER系统排名第一，其次是存储磷光体、传统和非对称胶片/屏射线照相系统。总之，AMBER显示出最高的图像质量。与传统胶片/屏系统相比，存储磷光体系统在外周和纵隔野提供了更好的结果。还讨论了其他数字系统，包括硒化镉胸部射线照相系统和影像增强器数字射线照相术。
