Büttner P, Garbe C, Bertz J, Burg G, d'Hoedt B, Drepper H, Guggenmoos-Holzmann I, Lechner W, Lippold A, Orfanos C E
University Department of Dermatology, Steglitz Medical Center, Berlin, Germany.
Cancer. 1995 May 15;75(10):2499-2506. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19950515)75:10<2499::aid-cncr2820751016>3.0.co;2-8.
Maximum tumor thickness and level of invasion are known to be the most important prognostic factors for patients with primary cutaneous melanoma. However, the classification of tumor thickness and the question of whether the combination of tumor thickness and level of invasion provides a better prognostic classification than tumor thickness alone are still matters of debate. The present study examined the relationship between tumor thickness and survival probability to define cutoff points of tumor thickness. Secondly, it investigated the prognostic value of the combination of tumor thickness and level of invasion as proposed in the current TNM classification system.
A series of 5093 patients with invasive primary cutaneous melanoma followed from 1970 to 1988 at four University centers in Germany (Departments of Dermatology in Tübingen, Würzburg, Berlin-Steglitz, and at the Fachklinik) were analyzed by multivariate Cox models.
The relationship between tumor thickness and relative risk of death caused by melanoma was found to be almost linear to a tumor thickness of 6 mm. For tumors greater than 6 mm, no further marked increase in relative risk was observed. The stratification of tumor thickness with endpoints at 1, 2, and 4 mm resulted in the best fit to the authors' data among all classifications with three endpoints, but differences were only slight. By multivariate analysis, the combination of tumor thickness and level of invasion as proposed by the current TNM classification were found to be prognostically less significant than tumor thickness alone. The prognostic influence of level of invasion was proved statistically only for tumor thickness less than or equal to 1 mm.
The proposed stratification of tumor thickness with cutoff points at 1, 2, and 4 mm was supported by multivariate statistical analysis. The analysis of the current TNM staging system indicates the precedence of tumor thickness for the staging of patients with primary cutaneous melanoma in the case of discordance between tumor thickness and level of invasion.
最大肿瘤厚度和浸润深度是原发性皮肤黑色素瘤患者最重要的预后因素。然而,肿瘤厚度的分类以及肿瘤厚度与浸润深度相结合是否比单独的肿瘤厚度能提供更好的预后分类,仍是存在争议的问题。本研究检测了肿瘤厚度与生存概率之间的关系以确定肿瘤厚度的临界点。其次,研究了当前TNM分类系统中所提出的肿瘤厚度与浸润深度相结合的预后价值。
采用多变量Cox模型分析了1970年至1988年在德国四个大学中心(图宾根、维尔茨堡、柏林-施泰格利茨的皮肤科以及专科诊所)随访的5093例浸润性原发性皮肤黑色素瘤患者。
发现肿瘤厚度与黑色素瘤所致死亡相对风险之间的关系在肿瘤厚度达6mm时几乎呈线性。对于大于6mm的肿瘤,未观察到相对风险有进一步明显增加。在所有有三个临界点的分类中,以1、2和4mm为临界点的肿瘤厚度分层与作者的数据拟合最佳,但差异仅很轻微。通过多变量分析,发现当前TNM分类所提出的肿瘤厚度与浸润深度相结合在预后方面不如单独的肿瘤厚度显著。仅在肿瘤厚度小于或等于1mm时,浸润深度的预后影响经统计学证实。
多变量统计分析支持所提出的以1、2和4mm为临界点的肿瘤厚度分层。对当前TNM分期系统的分析表明,在肿瘤厚度与浸润深度不一致的情况下,肿瘤厚度在原发性皮肤黑色素瘤患者分期中占优先地位。