Singh R S
Genetics. 1976 Mar 25;82(3):507-26. doi: 10.1093/genetics/82.3.507.
By using a number of different alcohols as substrates, eight alcohol dehydrogenase loci were discovered in Drosophila pseudoobscura. Each of these loci can take more than one substrate. Several of these loci differed in their tissue specificities and activity patterns during development. The genic variation in natural populations was studied at four of these loci and three of them were polymorphic. A quantitative study of substrate-specific differences among alleles of the same locus produced negative results. This result appears to be typical of most studies done on this aspect. From this it was concluded that the substrate specificity of enzymes is not an important factor in determining the greater amount of genic variation at Group II loci than at Group I loci, as proposed by KOJIMA, GILLESPIE and TOBARI (1970). There are several observations which suggest a different explanation for the differences in the genic variability at Group I and Group II loci: (1) There are, on an average, more isozyme loci (loci with similar substrate specificity) for enzymes in Group II than in Group I; (2) The null alleles are far more common at Group II loci than at Group I loci; (3) There is significant heterogeneity in the number of alleles and the heterozygosities at loci within each of these two groups of enzymes; (4) Relatively higher levels of genic variation are observed at Group II loci even in populations which appear to be living in homogeneous environments; and (5) Some loci (e.g. esterases) are highly polymorphic in most species investigated by gel electrophoresis techniques. Based on these general observations, it is proposed that (1) the substrate-specific differences are between isozyme loci and not between alleles of a given locus, and (2) neutral alleles are proportionately far more common at loci at Group II than at loci in Group I, because the former is under less selection constraint than the latter.
通过使用多种不同的醇类作为底物,在拟暗果蝇中发现了8个醇脱氢酶基因座。这些基因座中的每一个都可以作用于不止一种底物。其中几个基因座在发育过程中的组织特异性和活性模式有所不同。对其中4个基因座的自然种群基因变异进行了研究,发现其中3个是多态的。对同一基因座等位基因间底物特异性差异的定量研究得出了阴性结果。这一结果似乎是该方面大多数研究的典型情况。由此得出结论,酶的底物特异性并非决定第二组基因座比第一组基因座具有更多基因变异的重要因素,这是小岛、吉莱斯皮和户针(1970年)提出的观点。有几项观察结果为第一组和第二组基因座基因变异性的差异提出了不同的解释:(1)平均而言,第二组酶的同工酶基因座(具有相似底物特异性的基因座)比第一组多;(2)无效等位基因在第二组基因座比在第一组基因座更为常见;(3)这两组酶中各基因座的等位基因数量和杂合度存在显著异质性;(4)即使在似乎生活在同质环境中的种群中,第二组基因座也观察到相对较高水平的基因变异;(5)一些基因座(如酯酶)在通过凝胶电泳技术研究的大多数物种中具有高度多态性。基于这些一般观察结果,有人提出:(1)底物特异性差异存在于同工酶基因座之间,而非给定基因座的等位基因之间;(2)中性等位基因在第二组基因座中所占比例远高于第一组基因座,因为前者受到的选择约束比后者小。