• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

地标学习中的遮蔽效应:鸽子和人类的触屏研究

Overshadowing in landmark learning: touch-screen studies with pigeons and humans.

作者信息

Spetch M L

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1995 Apr;21(2):166-81. doi: 10.1037//0097-7403.21.2.166.

DOI:10.1037//0097-7403.21.2.166
PMID:7738499
Abstract

Overshadowing in landmark learning was studied in pigeons and undergraduates using a touch-screen spatial search task. Ss searched for an unmarked goal presented in varied locations on a computer screen. Graphic stimuli served as landmarks. The effect of the presence of other landmarks on the control acquired by a given landmark was assessed using a design in which each S was trained with 2 sets of landmarks. Both pigeons (Experiment 1) and humans (Experiments 2-4) showed evidence of learning more about a landmark that was the closest landmark of its set to the goal than about a landmark that was of equal distance to the goal but was not the closest landmark of its set. That is, control by a landmark was overshadowed when it occurred together with a landmark that was closer to the goal. Landmark effectiveness appears to depend not only on the absolute properties of a landmark but on relative factors. The relevance of basic principles of associative learning to spatial landmark learning is discussed.

摘要

利用触屏空间搜索任务,在鸽子和大学生中研究了地标学习中的遮蔽效应。被试在电脑屏幕上不同位置搜索一个无标记的目标。图形刺激作为地标。通过一种设计评估其他地标的存在对给定地标所获得控制的影响,即每个被试接受两组地标训练。鸽子(实验1)和人类(实验2 - 4)均显示出证据,表明相比与目标距离相等但不是其所在组中最接近目标的地标,被试对其所在组中最接近目标的地标学习更多。也就是说,当地标与更接近目标的地标同时出现时,该地标所产生的控制会被遮蔽。地标有效性似乎不仅取决于地标的绝对属性,还取决于相对因素。讨论了联想学习的基本原理与空间地标学习的相关性。

相似文献

1
Overshadowing in landmark learning: touch-screen studies with pigeons and humans.地标学习中的遮蔽效应:鸽子和人类的触屏研究
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1995 Apr;21(2):166-81. doi: 10.1037//0097-7403.21.2.166.
2
Learning the configuration of a landmark array: I. Touch-screen studies with pigeons and humans.学习地标阵列的配置:I. 鸽子和人类的触摸屏研究。
J Comp Psychol. 1996 Mar;110(1):55-68. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.110.1.55.
3
Overshadowing between landmarks on the touchscreen and in arena with pigeons.触摸屏上的地标与鸽舍中的地标之间的遮蔽效应。
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2011 Oct;37(4):488-94. doi: 10.1037/a0023914.
4
Learning of absolute and relative distance and direction from discrete visual landmarks by pigeons (Columba livia).鸽子(家鸽)从离散视觉地标学习绝对和相对距离及方向。
J Comp Psychol. 2009 Feb;123(1):90-113. doi: 10.1037/a0012905.
5
Use of redundant sets of landmark information by humans (Homo sapiens) in a goal-searching task in an open field and on a computer screen.人类(智人)在开阔场地和电脑屏幕上的目标搜索任务中对冗余地标信息集的使用。
J Comp Psychol. 2018 May;132(2):178-188. doi: 10.1037/com0000097. Epub 2018 Mar 8.
6
Flexible learning and use of multiple-landmark information by pigeons (Columba livia) in a touch screen-based goal searching task.鸽子(家鸽)在基于触摸屏的目标搜索任务中对多种地标信息的灵活学习与运用。
J Comp Psychol. 2011 Aug;125(3):317-27. doi: 10.1037/a0023044.
7
Spatial integration during performance in pigeons.鸽子在执行任务时的空间整合。
Behav Processes. 2018 Sep;154:73-80. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2017.12.012. Epub 2017 Dec 21.
8
Landmark stability: further studies pointing to a role in spatial learning.地标稳定性:进一步研究表明其在空间学习中的作用。
Q J Exp Psychol B. 1996 Nov;49(4):307-45. doi: 10.1080/713932636.
9
Learned predictiveness training modulates biases towards using boundary or landmark cues during navigation.习得性预测训练会调节导航过程中使用边界或地标线索的偏向。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2015;68(6):1183-202. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2014.977925. Epub 2014 Nov 20.
10
Cue integration in spatial search for jointly learned landmarks but not for separately learned landmarks.线索整合用于对共同学习的地标进行空间搜索,而非用于对单独学习的地标进行空间搜索。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2017 Dec;43(12):1857-1871. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000416. Epub 2017 May 15.

引用本文的文献

1
The Contribution of Internal and External Factors to Human Spatial Navigation.内部和外部因素对人类空间导航的作用
Brain Sci. 2024 Jun 7;14(6):585. doi: 10.3390/brainsci14060585.
2
Landmark Distance Impacts the Overshadowing Effect in Spatial Learning Using a Virtual Water Maze Task with Healthy Adults.地标距离对使用虚拟水迷宫任务的健康成年人在空间学习中的遮蔽效应产生影响。
Brain Sci. 2023 Sep 5;13(9):1287. doi: 10.3390/brainsci13091287.
3
Texas field crickets (Gryllus texensis) use visual cues to place learn but perform poorly when intra- and extra-maze cues conflict.
德克萨斯田野蟋蟀(Gryllus texensis)利用视觉线索进行学习,但当内迷宫和外迷宫线索发生冲突时,它们的表现就会很差。
Learn Behav. 2022 Sep;50(3):306-316. doi: 10.3758/s13420-022-00532-6. Epub 2022 Jun 9.
4
Spatial integration during performance in pigeons.鸽子在执行任务时的空间整合。
Behav Processes. 2018 Sep;154:73-80. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2017.12.012. Epub 2017 Dec 21.
5
The orientation of homing pigeons (Columba livia f.d.) with and without navigational experience in a two-dimensional environment.有导航经验和无导航经验的信鸽(家鸽原鸽)在二维环境中的定向。
PLoS One. 2017 Nov 27;12(11):e0188483. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0188483. eCollection 2017.
6
Are Distal and Proximal Visual Cues Equally Important during Spatial Learning in Mice? A Pilot Study of Overshadowing in the Spatial Domain.在小鼠空间学习过程中,远端和近端视觉线索同样重要吗?空间领域内遮蔽效应的一项初步研究。
Front Behav Neurosci. 2017 Jun 6;11:109. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2017.00109. eCollection 2017.
7
Scene Configuration and Object Reliability Affect the Use of Allocentric Information for Memory-Guided Reaching.场景配置和物体可靠性会影响以自我为中心的信息在记忆引导抓握中的使用。
Front Neurosci. 2017 Apr 13;11:204. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2017.00204. eCollection 2017.
8
Timing of interfering events in one-trial serial overshadowing of a taste aversion.味觉厌恶单次试验序列掩蔽中干扰事件的时机
Learn Behav. 2017 Jun;45(2):124-134. doi: 10.3758/s13420-016-0246-x.
9
Extinction and spontaneous recovery of spatial behavior in pigeons.鸽子空间行为的消退与自发恢复
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2015 Oct;41(4):371-7. doi: 10.1037/xan0000076.
10
Experimental Divergences in the Visual Cognition of Birds and Mammals.鸟类和哺乳动物视觉认知中的实验性差异
Comp Cogn Behav Rev. 2015;10:73-105. doi: 10.3819/ccbr.2015.100004.