• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

学习地标阵列的配置:I. 鸽子和人类的触摸屏研究。

Learning the configuration of a landmark array: I. Touch-screen studies with pigeons and humans.

作者信息

Spetch M L, Cheng K, MacDonald S E

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.

出版信息

J Comp Psychol. 1996 Mar;110(1):55-68. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.110.1.55.

DOI:10.1037/0735-7036.110.1.55
PMID:8851553
Abstract

Pigeons and humans searched on a touch-screen monitor for an unmarked goal located relative to an array of landmarks presented in varied screen locations. After training with the goal centered in various square arrays of 4 landmarks, humans, but not pigeons, transferred accurately to arrays with novel elements. Humans searched in the middle of expanded arrays, whereas pigeons preserved the distance and direction to a single landmark. When trained with the goal centered below 2 identical horizontally aligned landmarks, humans responded to horizontal expansions or contractions of the array by shifting their search vertically, preserving angles from landmarks to goal. Pigeons did not adjust their search vertically. Humans trained with a single landmark adjusted search distance when landmark size was changed. Both pigeons and humans use the configuration of a landmark array, but the underlying processes seem to differ.

摘要

鸽子和人类在触摸屏显示器上搜索一个未标记的目标,该目标相对于呈现于屏幕不同位置的一系列地标而定位。在用目标位于由4个地标组成的各种方形阵列中心进行训练后,人类能够准确地转移到具有新元素的阵列,而鸽子则不能。人类在扩展阵列的中间进行搜索,而鸽子则保持到单个地标的距离和方向。当用目标位于2个水平对齐的相同地标下方进行训练时,人类通过垂直移动搜索来响应阵列的水平扩展或收缩,保持从地标到目标的角度。鸽子不会垂直调整它们的搜索。用单个地标进行训练的人类在地标大小改变时会调整搜索距离。鸽子和人类都使用地标阵列的配置,但潜在过程似乎不同。

相似文献

1
Learning the configuration of a landmark array: I. Touch-screen studies with pigeons and humans.学习地标阵列的配置:I. 鸽子和人类的触摸屏研究。
J Comp Psychol. 1996 Mar;110(1):55-68. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.110.1.55.
2
Flexible learning and use of multiple-landmark information by pigeons (Columba livia) in a touch screen-based goal searching task.鸽子(家鸽)在基于触摸屏的目标搜索任务中对多种地标信息的灵活学习与运用。
J Comp Psychol. 2011 Aug;125(3):317-27. doi: 10.1037/a0023044.
3
Overshadowing in landmark learning: touch-screen studies with pigeons and humans.地标学习中的遮蔽效应:鸽子和人类的触屏研究
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1995 Apr;21(2):166-81. doi: 10.1037//0097-7403.21.2.166.
4
Pigeons' (Columba livia) hierarchical organization of local and global cues in touch screen tasks.鸽子(家鸽)在触屏任务中对局部和全局线索的层级组织。
Behav Processes. 2009 Feb;80(2):128-39. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2008.10.011. Epub 2008 Oct 31.
5
Learning of absolute and relative distance and direction from discrete visual landmarks by pigeons (Columba livia).鸽子(家鸽)从离散视觉地标学习绝对和相对距离及方向。
J Comp Psychol. 2009 Feb;123(1):90-113. doi: 10.1037/a0012905.
6
Searching by rules: pigeons' (Columba livia) landmark-based search according to constant bearing or constant distance.依据规则进行搜索:鸽子(家鸽)基于地标,按照恒定方位或恒定距离进行搜索。
J Comp Psychol. 2003 Jun;117(2):123-32. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.117.2.123.
7
The relative importance of location and feature cues for homing pigeon (Columba livia) goal recognition.位置和特征线索对信鸽(家鸽)目标识别的相对重要性。
J Comp Psychol. 1996 Mar;110(1):77-87. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.110.1.77.
8
Landmark stability: further studies pointing to a role in spatial learning.地标稳定性:进一步研究表明其在空间学习中的作用。
Q J Exp Psychol B. 1996 Nov;49(4):307-45. doi: 10.1080/713932636.
9
Internal sense of direction and landmark use in pigeons (Columba livia).鸽子(家鸽)的内部方向感和地标利用
J Comp Psychol. 2005 Aug;119(3):273-284. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.119.3.273.
10
Stimulus control in the use of landmarks by pigeons in a touch-screen task.在触摸屏任务中使用地标时鸽子的刺激控制。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1995 Mar;63(2):187-201. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1995.63-187.

引用本文的文献

1
Evidence for a general cognitive structure in pigeons (Columba livia).鸽子(Columba livia)具有一般认知结构的证据。
Anim Cogn. 2024 Nov 2;27(1):74. doi: 10.1007/s10071-024-01912-3.
2
Super-optimality and relative distance coding in location memory.位置记忆中的超最优性和相对距离编码。
Mem Cognit. 2024 Aug;52(6):1439-1450. doi: 10.3758/s13421-024-01553-4. Epub 2024 Mar 22.
3
Statistically Optimal Cue Integration During Human Spatial Navigation.人类空间导航过程中的统计最优线索整合
Psychon Bull Rev. 2023 Oct;30(5):1621-1642. doi: 10.3758/s13423-023-02254-w. Epub 2023 Apr 10.
4
From representations to servomechanisms to oscillators: my journey in the study of cognition.从表象到伺服机构再到振荡器:我在认知研究中的历程。
Anim Cogn. 2023 Jan;26(1):73-85. doi: 10.1007/s10071-022-01677-7. Epub 2022 Aug 27.
5
Integration of visual landmark cues in spatial memory.视觉地标线索在空间记忆中的整合。
Psychol Res. 2022 Jul;86(5):1636-1654. doi: 10.1007/s00426-021-01581-8. Epub 2021 Aug 21.
6
Middle identification for rhesus monkeys is influenced by number but not extent.恒河猴的中辨认同数字有关,而与范围无关。
Sci Rep. 2020 Oct 15;10(1):17402. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-74533-8.
7
Reorientation by features and geometry: Effects of healthy and degenerative age-related cognitive decline.基于特征和几何形状的重新定向:健康和与年龄相关的退行性认知衰退的影响。
Learn Behav. 2020 Mar;48(1):124-134. doi: 10.3758/s13420-019-00401-9.
8
Distance and direction, but not light cues, support response reversal learning.距离和方向,而非光信号,支持反应逆转学习。
Learn Behav. 2019 Mar;47(1):38-46. doi: 10.3758/s13420-018-0320-7.
9
Taking an insect-inspired approach to bird navigation.采用受昆虫启发的方法来研究鸟类导航。
Learn Behav. 2018 Mar;46(1):7-22. doi: 10.3758/s13420-018-0314-5.
10
Spatial integration during performance in pigeons.鸽子在执行任务时的空间整合。
Behav Processes. 2018 Sep;154:73-80. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2017.12.012. Epub 2017 Dec 21.