Choy A M, Darbar D, Lang C C, Pringle T H, McNeill G P, Kennedy N S, Struthers A D
Department of Cardiology, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee.
Br Heart J. 1994 Jul;72(1):16-22. doi: 10.1136/hrt.72.1.16.
The SAVE study showed that captopril improves mortality in patients with left ventricular dysfunction after myocardial infarction and that this benefit occurred even in patients with no clinically overt heart failure. On the basis of this, it seems important to identify correctly which patients have left ventricular dysfunction after a myocardial infarction. The objective was to compare various methods of identifying patients with left ventricular dysfunction (left ventricular ejection fraction, LVEF, < or = 40%) after acute myocardial infarction. The methods compared were echocardiography (quantitative and qualitative visual assessment), clinical evaluation (subjective assessment and three clinical score methods), and measurement of plasma concentrations of cardiac natriuretic peptide hormones (atrial and brain natriuretic peptides, ANP and BNP).
Cross sectional study of left ventricular function in patients two to eight days after acute myocardial infarction.
Coronary care unit of a teaching hospital.
75 survivors of a recent myocardial infarction aged 40 to 88 with no history of cardiac failure and without cardiogenic shock at the time of entry to the study.
Sensitivities and specificities of the various methods of detecting left ventricular dysfunction were calculated by comparing them with a cross sectional echocardiographic algorithm for LVEF.
Clinical impression was poor at identifying LVEF < 40% (sensitivity 46%). Clinical scoring improved this figure somewhat (modified Peel index sensitivity 64%). Qualitative visual assessment echocardiography was a more sensitive method (sensitivity 82%) for detecting LVEF < 40%. Plasma BNP concentration was also a sensitive measure for detecting left ventricular dysfunction (sensitivity 84%) but plasma ANP concentration was much poorer (sensitivity 64%).
Left ventricular dysfunction is easily and reliably detected by echocardiographic measurement of LVEF and also by a quick qualitative echocardiographic assessment but is likely to be missed by clinical assessment alone. High concentrations of plasma BNP maybe another useful indicator of left ventricular dysfunction, particularly in hospitals where not all patients can be screened by echocardiography or radionuclide ventriculography after myocardial infarction.
SAVE研究表明,卡托普利可降低心肌梗死后左心室功能不全患者的死亡率,而且这种益处甚至在无明显临床心力衰竭的患者中也会出现。基于此,正确识别哪些心肌梗死后患者存在左心室功能不全似乎很重要。目的是比较急性心肌梗死后识别左心室功能不全(左心室射血分数,LVEF,≤40%)患者的各种方法。所比较的方法包括超声心动图(定量和定性视觉评估)、临床评估(主观评估和三种临床评分方法)以及测定血浆心钠素激素浓度(心房利钠肽和脑利钠肽,ANP和BNP)。
对急性心肌梗死后2至8天患者的左心室功能进行横断面研究。
一家教学医院的冠心病监护病房。
75例近期心肌梗死幸存者,年龄40至88岁,无心力衰竭病史,进入研究时无心源性休克。
通过将各种检测左心室功能不全的方法与LVEF的横断面超声心动图算法进行比较,计算其敏感性和特异性。
临床判断在识别LVEF<40%方面表现较差(敏感性46%)。临床评分在一定程度上改善了这一情况(改良Peel指数敏感性64%)。定性视觉评估超声心动图是检测LVEF<40%更敏感的方法(敏感性82%)。血浆BNP浓度也是检测左心室功能不全的敏感指标(敏感性84%),但血浆ANP浓度则差得多(敏感性64%)。
通过超声心动图测量LVEF以及快速定性超声心动图评估可轻松、可靠地检测左心室功能不全,但仅靠临床评估可能会遗漏。血浆BNP高浓度可能是左心室功能不全的另一个有用指标,特别是在那些并非所有心肌梗死后患者都能接受超声心动图或放射性核素心室造影筛查的医院。