• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

非昏迷急性一氧化碳中毒患者:高压氧治疗还是常压氧治疗?

Non-comatose patients with acute carbon monoxide poisoning: hyperbaric or normobaric oxygenation?

作者信息

Ducassé J L, Celsis P, Marc-Vergnes J P

机构信息

Unité INSERM U 230, CHU Purpan, Toulouse, France.

出版信息

Undersea Hyperb Med. 1995 Mar;22(1):9-15.

PMID:7742714
Abstract

Twenty-six non-comatose patients with acute carbon monoxide (CO) poisoning were randomized into two groups. Both groups were treated as soon as possible and for 2 h, the first group by 100% normobaric oxygen (NBO) and the second by 100% hyperbaric oxygen. At the end of this period, patients treated by HBO had a significant improvement of their clinical and biological conditions compared with patients treated with NBO. Both groups then received the same NBO therapy for 10 h. At the end of this second period, carboxyhemoglobin level was normal in both groups. However, patients treated with NBO showed some clinical impairments, and 3 wk after onset had significantly more electroencephalogram abnormalities and a reduced cerebral blood flow reactivity to acetazolamide. We conclude that HBO reduces the time of initial recovery and the number of delayed functional abnormalities in non-comatose patients with acute CO poisoning. A practical scheme for the use of NBO and HBO in such patients is proposed.

摘要

26名非昏迷急性一氧化碳(CO)中毒患者被随机分为两组。两组均尽快接受治疗,持续2小时,第一组采用100%常压氧(NBO)治疗,第二组采用100%高压氧治疗。在此阶段结束时,与接受NBO治疗的患者相比,接受高压氧治疗的患者临床和生物学状况有显著改善。然后两组均接受相同的NBO治疗10小时。在第二阶段结束时,两组的碳氧血红蛋白水平均恢复正常。然而,接受NBO治疗的患者出现了一些临床损伤,发病3周后脑电图异常明显增多,对乙酰唑胺的脑血流反应性降低。我们得出结论,高压氧可缩短非昏迷急性CO中毒患者的初始恢复时间,并减少延迟性功能异常的数量。本文还提出了在这类患者中使用常压氧和高压氧的实用方案。

相似文献

1
Non-comatose patients with acute carbon monoxide poisoning: hyperbaric or normobaric oxygenation?非昏迷急性一氧化碳中毒患者:高压氧治疗还是常压氧治疗?
Undersea Hyperb Med. 1995 Mar;22(1):9-15.
2
Outcome of patients experiencing cardiac arrest with carbon monoxide poisoning treated with hyperbaric oxygen.接受高压氧治疗的一氧化碳中毒导致心脏骤停患者的预后。
Ann Emerg Med. 2001 Jul;38(1):36-41. doi: 10.1067/mem.2001.115532.
3
Improvement of occipital alpha activity by repetitive hyperbaric oxygen therapy in patients with carbon monoxide poisoning: a possible indicator for treatment efficacy.重复高压氧治疗对一氧化碳中毒患者枕叶α波活动的改善:治疗效果的一个可能指标
J Neurol Sci. 2005 Aug 15;235(1-2):69-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2005.04.005.
4
[Good results of 100% oxygen treatment for acute carbon monoxide poisoning; temporarily no indication for hyperbaric oxygenation].100%氧气治疗急性一氧化碳中毒效果良好;目前暂无需进行高压氧治疗的指征。
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1993 Apr 24;137(17):864-7.
5
Oxygen therapy for CO poisoning: rationale and recommendations.一氧化碳中毒的氧疗:原理与建议
Przegl Lek. 2005;62(6):436-7.
6
Hyperbaric oxygen for acute carbon monoxide poisoning.高压氧治疗急性一氧化碳中毒
N Engl J Med. 2002 Oct 3;347(14):1057-67. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa013121.
7
Analysis of the features of acute carbon monoxide poisoning and hyperbaric oxygen therapy in children.儿童急性一氧化碳中毒的特征及高压氧治疗分析
Turk J Pediatr. 2008 May-Jun;50(3):235-41.
8
Delayed hyperbaric oxygenation is more effective than early prolonged normobaric hyperoxia in experimental focal cerebral ischemia.在实验性局灶性脑缺血中,延迟高压氧疗比早期长时间常压高氧更有效。
Neurosci Lett. 2007 Oct 2;425(3):141-5. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2007.07.009. Epub 2007 Aug 1.
9
S100B protein in conscious carbon monoxide-poisoned rats treated with normobaric or hyperbaric oxygen.常压或高压氧治疗的清醒一氧化碳中毒大鼠中的S100B蛋白
Crit Care Med. 2006 Aug;34(8):2228-30. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000228913.61710.9D.
10
Severe carbon monoxide poisoning in the pediatric patient: a case report.小儿严重一氧化碳中毒:一例报告
Aviat Space Environ Med. 1996 Mar;67(3):262-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Carbon Monoxide Poisoning: From Occupational Health to Emergency Medicine.一氧化碳中毒:从职业健康到急诊医学
J Clin Med. 2024 Apr 23;13(9):2466. doi: 10.3390/jcm13092466.
2
Correlation between Time to Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy and Delayed Neurological Sequelae in Acute Carbon Monoxide Poisoning Patients.急性一氧化碳中毒患者高压氧治疗时间与迟发性神经后遗症的相关性
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Jan 15;14(2):186. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14020186.
3
Association between number of hyperbaric oxygen therapy sessions and neurocognitive outcomes of acute carbon monoxide poisoning.
高压氧治疗疗程次数与急性一氧化碳中毒神经认知结局之间的关联。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Feb 14;10:1127978. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1127978. eCollection 2023.
4
Quantitative pupillary light reflex assessment for prognosis of carbon monoxide poisoning.一氧化碳中毒预后的定量瞳孔光反射评估
Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Feb 28;10:1105705. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1105705. eCollection 2023.
5
Hyperbaric oxygen should be used for carbon monoxide poisoning.高压氧治疗应用于一氧化碳中毒。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2023 Mar;89(3):939-941. doi: 10.1111/bcp.15605. Epub 2022 Dec 1.
6
Should We Use Hyperbaric Oxygen for Carbon Monoxide Poisoning Management? A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.我们是否应该使用高压氧治疗一氧化碳中毒?一项随机对照试验的网状Meta分析。
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Jul 14;10(7):1311. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10071311.
7
Derivation and Validation of a Score for Predicting Poor Neurocognitive Outcomes in Acute Carbon Monoxide Poisoning.急性一氧化碳中毒患者神经认知预后不良评分的推导和验证。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 May 2;5(5):e2210552. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.10552.
8
Effectiveness of Hyperbaric Oxygenation Versus Normobaric Oxygenation Therapy in Carbon Monoxide Poisoning: A Systematic Review.高压氧疗与常压氧疗对一氧化碳中毒的疗效:一项系统评价
Cureus. 2019 Oct 15;11(10):e5916. doi: 10.7759/cureus.5916.
9
Effect of Hyperbaric Oxygen on Neurologic Sequelae and All-Cause Mortality in Patients with Carbon Monoxide Poisoning: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.高压氧对一氧化碳中毒患者神经后遗症和全因死亡率的影响:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Med Sci Monit. 2019 Oct 13;25:7684-7693. doi: 10.12659/MSM.917065.
10
The Diagnosis and Treatment of Carbon Monoxide Poisoning.一氧化碳中毒的诊断与治疗。
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2018 Dec 24;115(51-52):863-870. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2018.0863.