Skelton J
Department of General Practice, University of Birmingham.
Br J Gen Pract. 1994 Oct;44(387):455-9.
An increasing number of people involved in medicine are under pressure to publish research, but there is little understanding of how to describe structured writing.
This paper aims to describe the structure of original research papers published in the British Journal of General Practice with a view to providing insight into the nature of such analyses, and particularly to help researchers and trainers to write and teach writing more successfully.
A sample of 50 original papers published in the Journal between January 1989 and March 1993 were examined. The papers were subjected to a form of 'move structure analysis', a technique used in applied linguistics; move structure analysis assigns a tentative function to a piece of text, and identifies words/phrases associated with it. To be recognized, moves thus identified had to occur in the same section of the paper in 65% of the corpus, and/or appear in the same order relative to other moves in 50%.
Fifteen moves were identified, four in the introduction, three in the method, and four each in the results and discussion. These moves functioned, for example in the discussion, to state limitations and defend successes; describe achievements; contextualize procedures and findings; and offer recommendations. Frequency scores ranged from 66% to 100%, and order stability scores from 50% to 80%, with three moves being unordered.
It is possible to derive from this study a template for structuring academic medical writing. This template may be built up from the exemplary quotations in the text, to provide assistance to educators and less experienced writers.
越来越多从事医学工作的人面临着发表研究成果的压力,但对于如何描述结构化写作却知之甚少。
本文旨在描述发表在《英国全科医学杂志》上的原创研究论文的结构,以期深入了解此类分析的本质,特别是帮助研究人员和培训人员更成功地进行写作和教学写作。
对1989年1月至1993年3月间发表在该杂志上的50篇原创论文进行了抽样研究。这些论文采用了一种“步骤结构分析”形式,这是应用语言学中使用的一种技术;步骤结构分析为一段文本赋予一个暂定功能,并识别与之相关的单词/短语。为了被认可,这样识别出的步骤必须在语料库的65%的论文的同一部分中出现,和/或在50%的论文中相对于其他步骤以相同顺序出现。
识别出了15个步骤,引言部分有4个,方法部分有3个,结果和讨论部分各有4个。例如,在讨论中,这些步骤起到了陈述局限性和捍卫成功之处;描述成就;将程序和发现置于背景中;以及提供建议的作用。出现频率得分从66%到100%不等,顺序稳定性得分从50%到80%不等,有三个步骤是无序的。
从这项研究中可以得出一个构建学术医学写作结构的模板。这个模板可以从文本中的示例引文中构建起来,以帮助教育工作者和经验不足的作者。