Suppr超能文献

[赖纳·维尔纳·法斯宾德的《垃圾、城市与死亡》—— 一幅德国心灵图景]

[Rainer Werner Fassbinder's "Garbage, the city and death"-- a German landscape of the soul].

作者信息

Vogt R

机构信息

Inst. für Psychologie und Sozialforschung, Univ. Bremen.

出版信息

Psyche (Stuttg). 1995 Apr;49(4):309-72.

PMID:7754074
Abstract

No other recent "art event" has aroused so much public debate in Germany as Fassbinder's play "Garbage, City, Death" (1976). The controversy it sparked on its appearance has still not entirely died down. In a painstaking psychoanalytic interpretation Vogt first shows that the play achieves an artistic representation of the unconscious dilemma besetting the second generation of non-Jewish Germans in their relationship to National Socialism. In Fassbinder's play this dilemma, which is bound up with vicarious guilt feelings, is however only presented and not in any way worked out. The upshot is that all those forms of identification with German traditions that have been repudiated on a conscious level re-enter, as it were by the back door, and attain a new virulence. The author demonstrates that at the heart of the play a mechanism of guilt-refusal is operative that inverts the historical culprit-victim relation and makes the Germans themselves into the real victims. In the second part of his article Vogt is concerned to situate the play and the controversy surrounding it in a broader political context--Bitburg (1985), the "historians' conflict" (1986), Jenninger's speech (1988)--revealing a specific collective psychological inscape in present-day Germany for which, in its profounder well-springs, Fassbinder's play may be legitimately regarded as symptomatic. Fassbinder (born 1945) articulates for his generation aspects of an "ethnic disturbance" (George Devereux) which continues to persist precisely because there is a German past "that refuses to go away" (Ernst Nolte).

摘要

在德国,没有哪一场近期的“艺术事件”能像法斯宾德的戏剧《垃圾、城市、死亡》(1976年)那样引发如此多的公众辩论。该剧问世时引发的争议至今仍未完全平息。沃格特通过细致入微的精神分析解读,首先表明这部戏剧实现了对困扰第二代非犹太裔德国人在与纳粹关系中无意识困境的艺术呈现。然而,在法斯宾德的戏剧中,这种与替代性负罪感相关的困境只是被呈现出来,并未得到任何解决。结果是,所有那些在意识层面被摒弃的与德国传统的认同形式,仿佛通过后门重新进入,并获得了新的影响力。作者表明,在这部戏剧的核心运作着一种拒绝负罪的机制,它颠倒了历史上的加害者与受害者关系,使德国人自己成为真正的受害者。在文章的第二部分,沃格特致力于将这部戏剧及其引发的争议置于更广泛的政治背景中——比堡(1985年)、“历史学家之争”(1986年)、延宁格的演讲(1988年)——揭示了当今德国一种特定的集体心理图景,从其更深层次的根源来看,法斯宾德的戏剧可以被合理地视为其症状表现。法斯宾德(生于1945年)为他那一代人阐明了一种“种族困扰”(乔治·德弗勒克斯)的诸多方面,这种困扰持续存在恰恰是因为有一个“拒绝离去”的德国历史(恩斯特·诺尔特)。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验