Defraigne J O
Department of Cardio-Vascular Surgery, C.H.U. Liège, Sart-Tilman, Belgium.
Acta Chir Belg. 1995 Mar-Apr;95(2):113-7.
At the moment, the place of experimental surgery within the clinical surgical cores is questioned. However, its role in the progresses of surgical practice and training of surgeons is undisputable. It is through research that surgeons can keep some critical mind, essential in their daily activities. However, too often actually, the surgeons abandon research. Two essential reasons explain the phenomenon: on the one hand, the weight of the clinical tasks and on the other hand the complexity of research founded on more and more specialized basic notions. In fact, the part of a surgical investigator must be to form a link between basic research and clinical activities. As such, work in collaboration with motivated basic investigators is cardinal. Also, the success of research depends upon the will of the departments to maintain a research activity, but it meets often with the difficulty in obtaining sufficient research credits. Finally, research can play an essential part in the education of the trainees and partly fill some gaps in their clinical training.
目前，实验外科在临床外科核心领域中的地位受到质疑。然而，它在外科实践进展和外科医生培训方面的作用是无可争议的。正是通过研究，外科医生才能保持某种批判性思维，这在他们的日常活动中至关重要。然而，实际上外科医生常常放弃研究。有两个主要原因可以解释这一现象：一方面是临床任务的繁重，另一方面是基于越来越专业化的基础概念的研究的复杂性。事实上，外科研究者的角色必须是在基础研究和临床活动之间建立联系。因此，与积极主动的基础研究者合作至关重要。此外，研究的成功取决于各科室维持研究活动的意愿，但常常面临难以获得足够研究学分的困难。最后，研究在实习生教育中可以发挥重要作用，并部分填补他们临床培训中的一些空白。
