Böcking A, Klose K C, Kyll H J, Hauptmann S
Institute of Cytopathology, University of Düsseldorf, Germany.
Acta Cytol. 1995 May-Jun;39(3):463-71.
Fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) and punch biopsy (PB) are reliable methods of establishing a morphologic diagnosis in thoracic lesions. However, some reservations exist concerning the diagnostic accuracy of and indications for both methods. Therefore, we evaluated the sensitivity, specificity, typing accuracy and complication rates of both methods. We present a six-year experience with 501 thoracic FNABs and PBs in 482 patients. To examine site-specific differences, we evaluated three different compartments: lung, mediastinum and hilum. In 457 cases the final outcome was known for evaluating the accuracy of the cytologic or histologic diagnoses. FNAB was used most often in lung (81.8%) and hilar lesions (87.3%), whereas PB was used mostly in mediastinal (67.9%) and pleural lesions or if a mesenchymal lesion was suggested radiologically but never in foci below 20 mm in diameter. Our complication rate was 21.3% for FNAB and 4.6% for PB. The most frequent complications were pneumothorax, one hematothorax and intercostal neuralgia. The overall sensitivities of the biopsy methods were equal (FNAB, 98.4%; PB, 98%), but the typing accuracy was better for PB than FNAB (87.2% vs. 83.5%). In the hilum the sensitivities of FNAB and PB were 94.6% and 85.7%, respectively, and for the lungs, 99% and 98.2%. In the mediastinum the sensitivity was 100% for both methods. There were false-positive diagnoses in 5% with FNAB of the lung due to misinterpretation of regenerating epithelium and hamartochondroma and a 0.1% rate of false-negative diagnoses as a result of misplacement of the cannula, leading to inflammation, infarction or scarring. Our data indicate that FNAB is the method of choice in pulmonary and hilar lesions because of the similar diagnostic accuracy. Mediastinal and pleural lesions and presumed mesenchymal tumors should be sampled with PB because the typing accuracy of FNAB is insufficient in these cases.
细针穿刺活检(FNAB)和打孔活检(PB)是在胸部病变中建立形态学诊断的可靠方法。然而,对于这两种方法的诊断准确性和适应证存在一些保留意见。因此,我们评估了这两种方法的敏感性、特异性、分型准确性和并发症发生率。我们介绍了对482例患者进行501次胸部FNAB和PB的六年经验。为了研究部位特异性差异,我们评估了三个不同的区域:肺、纵隔和肺门。在457例病例中,已知最终结果以评估细胞学或组织学诊断的准确性。FNAB最常用于肺(81.8%)和肺门病变(87.3%),而PB主要用于纵隔(67.9%)和胸膜病变,或者如果影像学提示间质性病变,但从未用于直径小于20mm的病灶。我们的FNAB并发症发生率为21.3%,PB为4.6%。最常见的并发症是气胸、1例血胸和肋间神经痛。活检方法的总体敏感性相等(FNAB,98.4%;PB,98%),但PB的分型准确性优于FNAB(分别为87.2%和83.5%)。在肺门,FNAB和PB的敏感性分别为94.6%和85.7%,在肺中分别为99%和98.2%。在纵隔中,两种方法的敏感性均为100%。肺的FNAB中有5%因对再生上皮和错构瘤的错误解读而出现假阳性诊断,因套管放置不当导致炎症、梗死或瘢痕形成而出现0.1%的假阴性诊断率。我们的数据表明,由于诊断准确性相似,FNAB是肺和肺门病变的首选方法。纵隔和胸膜病变以及推测的间质性肿瘤应采用PB取样,因为在这些病例中FNAB的分型准确性不足。