Suppr超能文献

七氟醚、安氟醚、异氟醚、氟烷和七氟烷被碱石灰和钡石灰降解产生一氧化碳的情况。

Carbon monoxide production from degradation of desflurane, enflurane, isoflurane, halothane, and sevoflurane by soda lime and Baralyme.

作者信息

Fang Z X, Eger E I, Laster M J, Chortkoff B S, Kandel L, Ionescu P

机构信息

Department of Anesthesia, University of California, San Francisco 94143-0464, USA.

出版信息

Anesth Analg. 1995 Jun;80(6):1187-93. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199506000-00021.

Abstract

Anecdotal reports suggest that soda lime and Baralyme brand absorbent can degrade inhaled anesthetics to carbon monoxide (CO). We examined the factors that govern CO production and found that these include: 1) The anesthetic used: for a given minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration (MAC)-multiple, the magnitude of CO production (greatest to least) is desflurane > or = enflurane > isoflurane >> halothane = sevoflurane. 2) The absorbent dryness: completely dry soda lime produces much more CO than absorbent with just 1.4% water content, and soda lime containing 4.8% or more water (standard soda lime contains 15% water) generates no CO. In contrast, both completely dry Baralyme and Baralyme with 1.6% water produce high concentrations of CO, and Baralyme containing 4.7% water produces concentrations equaling those produced by soda lime containing 1.4% water. Baralyme containing 9.7% or more water and standard Baralyme (13% water) do not generate CO.3) The type of absorbent: at a given water content, Baralyme produces more CO than does soda lime. 4) The temperature: an increased temperature increases CO production. 5) The anesthetic concentration: more CO is produced from higher anesthetic concentrations. These results suggest that CO generation can be avoided for all anesthetics by using soda lime with 4.8% (or more) water or Baralyme with 9.7% (or more) water, and by using inflow rates of less than 2-3 L/min. Such inflow rates are low enough to ensure that the absorbent does not dry out.

摘要

轶事报告表明,苏打石灰和碱石灰品牌的吸收剂可将吸入麻醉剂降解为一氧化碳(CO)。我们研究了控制CO产生的因素,发现这些因素包括:1)所用麻醉剂:对于给定的最低肺泡麻醉浓度(MAC)倍数,CO产生量的大小(从大到小)为地氟醚>或=恩氟烷>异氟烷>>氟烷=七氟烷。2)吸收剂的干燥程度:完全干燥的苏打石灰产生的CO比含水量仅为1.4%的吸收剂多得多,而含水量为4.8%或更高(标准苏打石灰含水量为15%)的苏打石灰不产生CO。相比之下,完全干燥的碱石灰和含水量为1.6%的碱石灰都会产生高浓度的CO,而含水量为4.7%的碱石灰产生的浓度与含水量为1.4%的苏打石灰产生的浓度相当。含水量为9.7%或更高的碱石灰和标准碱石灰(含水量13%)不会产生CO。3)吸收剂的类型:在给定的含水量下碱石灰产生的CO比苏打石灰多。4)温度:温度升高会增加CO的产生。5)麻醉剂浓度:较高的麻醉剂浓度会产生更多的CO。这些结果表明,通过使用含水量为4.8%(或更高)的苏打石灰或含水量为9.7%(或更高)的碱石灰,并使用小于2-3L/分钟的流入速率,可以避免所有麻醉剂产生CO。这样的流入速率足够低,以确保吸收剂不会变干。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验