• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于人群的病例对照研究中绝对风险估计值的推断方法。

Methods of inference for estimates of absolute risk derived from population-based case-control studies.

作者信息

Benichou J, Gail M H

机构信息

National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland 20892, USA.

出版信息

Biometrics. 1995 Mar;51(1):182-94.

PMID:7766773
Abstract

The absolute risk is the probability of developing a given disease over a specified time interval given age and risk factors. Gail, et al. (1989, Journal of the National Cancer Institute 81, 1879-1888) obtained point estimates from population-based case control data by combining relative risk estimates from the case control data and composite incidence estimates from the cohort data. They also obtained variance estimates, but they only took into account the variability in estimating relative risks. In this paper, we present variance estimates that take into account all components of variability, namely the variance of relative risk estimates and of baseline incidence estimates, as well as the covariance between the two, the latter term being obtained by using implicit delta method arguments (Benichou and Gail, 1989, The American Statistician 43, 41-44). Simulations demonstrate the validity of such variance estimates as well as of corresponding confidence intervals. These methods are applied to a population-based case control study of breast cancer.

摘要

绝对风险是指在给定年龄和风险因素的情况下,在特定时间间隔内患某种特定疾病的概率。盖尔等人(1989年,《国家癌症研究所杂志》81卷,第1879 - 1888页)通过将病例对照数据中的相对风险估计值与队列数据中的综合发病率估计值相结合,从基于人群的病例对照数据中获得了点估计值。他们还获得了方差估计值,但只考虑了估计相对风险时的变异性。在本文中,我们给出了考虑所有变异性成分的方差估计值,即相对风险估计值和基线发病率估计值的方差,以及两者之间的协方差,后一项是通过使用隐式德尔塔方法论证得到的(贝尼舒和盖尔,1989年,《美国统计学家》43卷,第41 - 44页)。模拟结果证明了这种方差估计值以及相应置信区间的有效性。这些方法应用于一项基于人群的乳腺癌病例对照研究。

相似文献

1
Methods of inference for estimates of absolute risk derived from population-based case-control studies.基于人群的病例对照研究中绝对风险估计值的推断方法。
Biometrics. 1995 Mar;51(1):182-94.
2
Effects of long-term exposure to traffic-related air pollution on respiratory and cardiovascular mortality in the Netherlands: the NLCS-AIR study.长期暴露于交通相关空气污染对荷兰呼吸道和心血管疾病死亡率的影响:荷兰长期队列空气污染研究(NLCS-AIR研究)
Res Rep Health Eff Inst. 2009 Mar(139):5-71; discussion 73-89.
3
Maximum likelihood estimation of the attributable fraction from logistic models.逻辑模型中归因分数的最大似然估计。
Biometrics. 1993 Sep;49(3):865-72.
4
Estimation of absolute risk from nested case-control data.从巢式病例对照数据估计绝对风险。
Biometrics. 1997 Jun;53(2):767-74.
5
Variance calculations and confidence intervals for estimates of the attributable risk based on logistic models.基于逻辑模型的归因风险估计的方差计算和置信区间。
Biometrics. 1990 Dec;46(4):991-1003.
6
Risk factors for subsequent invasive breast cancer and breast cancer death after ductal carcinoma in situ: a population-based case-control study in Sweden.导管原位癌后发生浸润性乳腺癌及乳腺癌死亡的危险因素:瑞典一项基于人群的病例对照研究
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2001 May;10(5):495-9.
7
Breast cancer risk assessment in the Czech female population--an adjustment of the original Gail model.捷克女性人群乳腺癌风险评估——原盖尔模型的调整
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2006 Jan;95(1):29-35. doi: 10.1007/s10549-005-9027-5. Epub 2005 Dec 1.
8
[Meta-analysis of the Italian studies on short-term effects of air pollution].[意大利关于空气污染短期影响研究的荟萃分析]
Epidemiol Prev. 2001 Mar-Apr;25(2 Suppl):1-71.
9
Correcting for the effect of misclassification bias in a case-control study using data from two different questionnaires.
Biometrics. 1983 Sep;39(3):659-63.
10
Association and aggregation analysis using kin-cohort designs with applications to genotype and family history data from the Washington Ashkenazi Study.使用亲属队列设计进行关联和聚集分析及其在华盛顿阿什肯纳兹研究的基因型和家族史数据中的应用。
Genet Epidemiol. 2001 Sep;21(2):123-38. doi: 10.1002/gepi.1022.

引用本文的文献

1
Design aspects for prognostic factor studies.预后因素研究的设计方面。
BMJ Open. 2025 Aug 31;15(8):e095065. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-095065.
2
A Systematic Review and Critical Assessment of Breast Cancer Risk Prediction Tools Incorporating a Polygenic Risk Score for the General Population.一项针对纳入多基因风险评分的一般人群乳腺癌风险预测工具的系统评价与批判性评估。
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Nov 12;15(22):5380. doi: 10.3390/cancers15225380.
3
Development and validation of an individualized risk prediction model for oropharynx cancer in the US population.
建立并验证美国人群口咽癌个体化风险预测模型。
Cancer. 2019 Dec 15;125(24):4407-4416. doi: 10.1002/cncr.32412. Epub 2019 Aug 27.
4
Development of a Breast Cancer Risk Prediction Model for Women in Nigeria.尼日利亚女性乳腺癌风险预测模型的建立。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2018 Jun;27(6):636-643. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-17-1128. Epub 2018 Apr 20.
5
On estimation of time-dependent attributable fraction from population-based case-control studies.基于人群的病例对照研究中时间依赖性归因分数的估计
Biometrics. 2017 Sep;73(3):866-875. doi: 10.1111/biom.12648. Epub 2017 Jan 18.
6
Bridging the etiologic and prognostic outlooks in individualized assessment of absolute risk of an illness: application in lung cancer.在个体化评估疾病绝对风险中弥合病因学和预后观点:在肺癌中的应用。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2016 Nov;31(11):1091-1099. doi: 10.1007/s10654-016-0180-4. Epub 2016 Jul 11.
7
Predicting Adverse Health Outcomes in Long-Term Survivors of a Childhood Cancer.预测儿童癌症长期幸存者的不良健康结局
Children (Basel). 2014 Sep;1(2):63-73. doi: 10.3390/children1020063.
8
A regression model for risk difference estimation in population-based case-control studies clarifies gender differences in lung cancer risk of smokers and never smokers.基于人群的病例对照研究中用于风险差估计的回归模型阐明了吸烟者和不吸烟者肺癌风险的性别差异。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013 Nov 19;13:143. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-13-143.
9
Population-based absolute risk estimation with survey data.基于人群的调查数据绝对风险估计
Lifetime Data Anal. 2014 Apr;20(2):252-75. doi: 10.1007/s10985-013-9258-4. Epub 2013 May 18.
10
Variance computations for functional of absolute risk estimates.绝对风险估计函数的方差计算。
Stat Probab Lett. 2011 Jul 1;81(7):807-812. doi: 10.1016/j.spl.2011.02.002.