Rockney R M, McQuade W H, Days A L
Department of Pediatrics, Brown University, Memorial Hospital, Pawtucket, RI 02860, USA.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1995 Jun;149(6):623-7. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1995.02170190033006.
To determine whether fecal retention in encopretic children can be assessed objectively using the plain abdominal roentgenogram and whether roentgenographic evidence of fecal retention is associated with clinical findings on presentation in encopretic children.
Retrospective case studies.
Two pediatric incontinence clinics.
Sixty children (72% male), aged 4 to 18 years (mean, 8 years), who met Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Revised Third Edition criteria for the diagnosis of encopresis. All had a plain abdominal roentgenogram obtained on presentation.
None.
Using a systematic assessment tool with good interrater reliability (kappa = 0.65), 78% (47) of the children had fecal retention by roentgenographic criteria on presentation, while 22% (13) did not. Retentive encopretic children were less likely to have a history of difficult toilet training (P = .018) than nonretentive encopretic children. There was no association between fecal retention and several clinical factors, including historical features commonly attributed to fecal retention. Retentive encopretic children were no more likely to have a palpable abdominal mass than nonretentive encopretic children, but they were more likely to have excessive stool on rectal examination (P = .015). Using the plain abdominal roentgenogram as the gold standard, the rectal examination showed a positive predictive value of 84.8% and a negative predictive value of 50% in assessing fecal retention.
Fecal retention in encopretic children can be assessed objectively from a plain abdominal roentgenogram. Most, but not all, encopretic children present with fecal retention. A positive rectal examination is strongly predictive of fecal retention, in which case a roentgenogram is not necessary to make that diagnosis. A negative rectal examination may not rule out fecal retention, in which case an abdominal roentgenogram may be useful to make that diagnosis.
确定能否通过腹部平片对大便失禁患儿的粪便潴留情况进行客观评估,以及粪便潴留的影像学证据是否与大便失禁患儿就诊时的临床表现相关。
回顾性病例研究。
两家儿科尿失禁诊所。
60名年龄在4至18岁(平均8岁)的儿童(72%为男性),符合《精神疾病诊断与统计手册(第三版修订本)》中大便失禁的诊断标准。所有患儿就诊时均进行了腹部平片检查。
无。
使用一种具有良好评分者间信度(kappa = 0.65)的系统评估工具,78%(47名)患儿就诊时根据影像学标准存在粪便潴留,而22%(13名)患儿不存在。与非潴留性大便失禁患儿相比,潴留性大便失禁患儿有排便训练困难病史的可能性较小(P = 0.018)。粪便潴留与包括通常归因于粪便潴留的病史特征在内的多种临床因素之间无关联。与非潴留性大便失禁患儿相比,潴留性大便失禁患儿触及腹部肿块的可能性并无增加,但直肠检查时大便过多的可能性更大(P = 0.015)。以腹部平片作为金标准,直肠检查在评估粪便潴留时的阳性预测值为84.8%,阴性预测值为50%。
可通过腹部平片对大便失禁患儿的粪便潴留情况进行客观评估。大多数(但并非全部)大便失禁患儿存在粪便潴留。直肠检查结果为阳性强烈提示存在粪便潴留,在这种情况下无需进行平片检查来确诊。直肠检查结果为阴性可能无法排除粪便潴留,在这种情况下腹部平片检查可能有助于确诊。