Suppr超能文献

注意力缺陷多动障碍与品行障碍共病的四种假设检验

Test of four hypotheses for the comorbidity of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder and conduct disorder.

作者信息

Schachar R, Tannock R

机构信息

Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.

出版信息

J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1995 May;34(5):639-48. doi: 10.1097/00004583-199505000-00016.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To study the basis of the comorbidity of two common psychiatric disorders of childhood: attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and conduct disorder (CD).

METHOD

Subjects were 45 boys (aged 7 to 11 years) with either ADHD, CD, or ADHD + CD and 16 normal control children (NC) studied by means of a 2 (ADHD versus no ADHD) x 2 (CD versus no CD) design. We (1) tested whether similar or different patterns of cognitive, developmental risk, and psychosocial factors characterize the "pure" forms of the two disorders (i.e., ADHD and CD), and (2) compared the profile of the comorbid group (ADHD + CD) with those of the two pure groups.

RESULTS

The ADHD group was significantly impaired on cognitive measures (inhibitory control and response alteration) and had greater delay in development and greater reading problems compared with CD and NC children; the CD group was exposed to significantly greater environmental adversity and had more severe problems in arithmetic than the ADHD and NC groups. The ADHD+CD group was similar to the ADHD group on cognitive, developmental, and reading measures and similar to the CD group on psychosocial and arithmetic measures.

CONCLUSIONS

These results support the distinctiveness of ADHD and CD and the hypothesis that the comorbid condition of ADHD + CD is a hybrid of pure ADHD and pure CD.

摘要

目的

研究儿童两种常见精神障碍共病的基础:注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)和品行障碍(CD)。

方法

研究对象为45名男孩(年龄7至11岁),他们分别患有ADHD、CD或ADHD + CD,以及16名正常对照儿童(NC),采用2(ADHD与非ADHD)×2(CD与非CD)设计进行研究。我们(1)测试两种障碍的“单纯”形式(即ADHD和CD)是否具有相似或不同的认知、发育风险和心理社会因素模式,以及(2)将共病组(ADHD + CD)的特征与两个单纯组的特征进行比较。

结果

与CD组和NC组儿童相比,ADHD组在认知测量(抑制控制和反应改变)方面存在显著损害,发育延迟更严重,阅读问题更多;CD组面临的环境逆境明显更大,算术问题比ADHD组和NC组更严重。ADHD + CD组在认知、发育和阅读测量方面与ADHD组相似,在心理社会和算术测量方面与CD组相似。

结论

这些结果支持了ADHD和CD的独特性,以及ADHD + CD共病状况是单纯ADHD和单纯CD混合的假说。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验