Suppr超能文献

克霉唑、氟康唑和伊曲康唑治疗阴道念珠菌病的比较。

Comparison of clotrimazole, fluconazole and itraconazole in vaginal candidiasis.

作者信息

Woolley P D, Higgins S P

机构信息

Department of Genitourinary Medicine, University Hospital of South Manchester.

出版信息

Br J Clin Pract. 1995 Mar-Apr;49(2):65-6.

PMID:7779645
Abstract

Women attending a genitourinary medicine clinic (n = 229) with mycologically confirmed acute vulvovaginal candidiasis were randomised to receive either clotrimazole (500 mg pessary and 1% cream), fluconazole (150 mg single oral dose) or itraconazole (200 mg bd oral dose for 1 day). Mycological cure rates were 96% in the itraconazole group, 95% in the clotrimazole group, and 83% in the fluconazole group (P = 0.008). The proportion of patients who were clinically cured showed a similar pattern (itraconazole 80%, clotrimazole 80%, fluconazole 62%). This suggests that itraconazole or clotrimazole are more effective than fluconazole in the treatment of acute vaginal candidiasis.

摘要

在一家泌尿生殖医学诊所就诊的229名经真菌学确诊为急性外阴阴道念珠菌病的女性被随机分为三组,分别接受克霉唑(500毫克栓剂和1%乳膏)、氟康唑(150毫克单次口服剂量)或伊曲康唑(200毫克每日两次口服剂量,服用1天)治疗。伊曲康唑组的真菌学治愈率为96%,克霉唑组为95%,氟康唑组为83%(P = 0.008)。临床治愈的患者比例呈现类似模式(伊曲康唑80%,克霉唑80%,氟康唑62%)。这表明在治疗急性阴道念珠菌病方面,伊曲康唑或克霉唑比氟康唑更有效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验