Nagle R J, Bell N L
Department of Psychology, University of South Carolina, Columbia 29208, USA.
J Clin Psychol. 1995 Jan;51(1):63-70. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(199501)51:1<63::aid-jclp2270510111>3.0.co;2-d.
This study investigated the comparability of item-reduction and subtest-reduction short forms of the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale: Fourth Edition (SB:IV) with the complete battery in a sample of college students. All item-reduction SASs were not significantly different from the full battery SASs. Correlations for corresponding SASs and subtests between the complete and short form were highly significant, and analyses of the short-form profile supported the interpretation of individual subtests. The subtest-reduction short-form SASs were significantly lower than both the item-reduction short form and the full battery. Thus, an item-reduction short form proved to be a more comparable estimate of the full battery composite than the subtest-reduction short form.
本研究在大学生样本中，调查了《斯坦福-比奈智力量表：第四版》（SB:IV）的项目缩减版和分测验缩减版简式与完整版测验的可比性。所有项目缩减版的全量表智商（SASs）与完整版的全量表智商无显著差异。完整版和简式相应的全量表智商及分测验之间的相关性非常显著，且简式剖面图分析支持了对各个分测验的解释。分测验缩减版简式的全量表智商显著低于项目缩减版简式和完整版。因此，与分测验缩减版简式相比，项目缩减版简式被证明是对完整版合成分数更具可比性的估计。
