Walma E P, van Dooren C, van der Does E, Prins A, Mulder P, Hoes A W
Department of General Practice, Erasmus University Medical School, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
J Hum Hypertens. 1995 Mar;9(3):169-74.
The purpose of this study was to assess the accuracy of the Omron HEM403C blood pressure (BP) device and to study whether this accuracy was affected by subject-related factors such as BP level and age. A comparison was made with a Hawksley random zero sphygmomanometer. BP was measured with both meters connected to one arm-cuff by means of a T-connector. To assess the level of agreement of the Omron HEM403C with the random zero meter, BP was measured in 212 subjects. Systolic and diastolic readings with the Omron HEM403C were on average 1 mmHg (s.d. 9, 95% CI 0.4-2.2) and 4 mm Hg (s.d. 8, 95% CI 3.6-5.1) respectively, higher than those with the random zero meter. The Omron HEM403C underestimated SBP compared with the random zero at higher SBP levels and overestimated SBP at lower SBP levels. The Omron meter overestimated the diastolic pressure at all DBP levels and the diastolic difference was not related to the DBP level. A multiple linear regression analysis demonstrated that the SBP level and not age was the factor that independently influenced the systolic difference between the meters. According to the criteria of the British Hypertension Society the Omron HEM403C is accurate enough to be recommended for those clinical and research purposes that are in need of automatic measurements.
本研究的目的是评估欧姆龙HEM403C血压计的准确性,并研究这种准确性是否受到与受试者相关的因素(如血压水平和年龄)的影响。将其与Hawksley随机零位血压计进行比较。通过T形连接器将两个血压计连接到一个臂式袖带,对212名受试者进行血压测量。欧姆龙HEM403C测量的收缩压和舒张压读数分别平均比随机零位血压计高1 mmHg(标准差9,95%可信区间0.4 - 2.2)和4 mmHg(标准差8,95%可信区间3.6 - 5.1)。与随机零位血压计相比,在较高收缩压水平时,欧姆龙HEM403C低估收缩压;在较低收缩压水平时,高估收缩压。在所有舒张压水平上,欧姆龙血压计均高估舒张压,且舒张压差异与舒张压水平无关。多元线性回归分析表明,影响两种血压计收缩压差值的独立因素是收缩压水平而非年龄。根据英国高血压学会的标准,欧姆龙HEM403C的准确性足以推荐用于需要自动测量的临床和研究目的。