• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

The covariance decomposition of the probability score and its use in evaluating prognostic estimates. SUPPORT Investigators.

作者信息

Arkes H R, Dawson N V, Speroff T, Harrell F E, Alzola C, Phillips R, Desbiens N, Oye R K, Knaus W, Connors A F

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Ohio University, Athens 45701, USA.

出版信息

Med Decis Making. 1995 Apr-Jun;15(2):120-31. doi: 10.1177/0272989X9501500204.

DOI:10.1177/0272989X9501500204
PMID:7783572
Abstract

The probability score (PS) or Brier score has been used in a large number of studies in which physician judgment performance was assessed. However, the covariance decomposition of the PS has not previously been used to evaluate medical judgment. The authors introduce the technique and demonstrate it by analyzing prognostic estimates of three groups: physicians, their patients, and the patients' decision-making surrogates. The major components of the covariance decomposition--bias, slope, and scatter--are displayed in covariance graphs for each of the three groups. The decomposition reveals that whereas the physicians have the best overall estimation performance, their bias and their scatter are not always superior to those of the other two groups. This is primarily due to two factors. First, the physicians' prognostic estimates are pessimistic. Second, the patients place the large majority of their estimates in the most optimistic category, thereby achieving low scatter. The authors suggest that the calculational simplicity of this decomposition, its informativeness, and the intuitive nature of its components make it a useful tool with which to analyze medical judgment.

摘要

相似文献

1
The covariance decomposition of the probability score and its use in evaluating prognostic estimates. SUPPORT Investigators.
Med Decis Making. 1995 Apr-Jun;15(2):120-31. doi: 10.1177/0272989X9501500204.
2
Prevalence of and Factors Related to Discordance About Prognosis Between Physicians and Surrogate Decision Makers of Critically Ill Patients.重症患者的医生和代理人在预后方面存在分歧的流行率及相关因素。
JAMA. 2016 May 17;315(19):2086-94. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.5351.
3
Double Conjunction Fallacies in Physicians' Probability Judgment.医生概率判断中的双重结合谬误。
Med Decis Making. 2018 Aug;38(6):756-760. doi: 10.1177/0272989X18786358. Epub 2018 Jul 6.
4
Overestimation of test effects in clinical judgment.临床判断中对测试效果的高估。
J Cancer Educ. 1993 Winter;8(4):297-307. doi: 10.1080/08858199309528246.
5
What difference do two days make? The inertia of physicians' sequential prognostic judgments for critically ill patients.
Med Decis Making. 1990 Jan-Mar;10(1):6-14. doi: 10.1177/0272989X9001000103.
6
Probability judgement in medicine: discounting unspecified possibilities.
Med Decis Making. 1995 Jul-Sep;15(3):227-30. doi: 10.1177/0272989X9501500305.
7
Evaluating physicians' probabilistic judgments.评估医生的概率判断。
Med Decis Making. 1988 Oct-Dec;8(4):233-40. doi: 10.1177/0272989X8800800403.
8
Assessing physicians' estimates of the probability of coronary artery disease: the influence of patient characteristics.
Med Decis Making. 1992 Apr-Jun;12(2):109-14. doi: 10.1177/0272989X9201200203.
9
Does choosing a treatment depend on making a diagnosis? US and French physicians' decision making about acute otitis media.治疗方案的选择是否取决于做出诊断?美国和法国医生关于急性中耳炎的决策制定。
Med Decis Making. 2002 Sep-Oct;22(5):394-402. doi: 10.1177/027298902236941.
10
Availability, wishful thinking, and physicians' diagnostic judgments for patients with suspected bacteremia.
Med Decis Making. 1991 Jul-Sep;11(3):159-68. doi: 10.1177/0272989X9101100303.

引用本文的文献

1
Genome-wide analysis in over 1 million individuals of European ancestry yields improved polygenic risk scores for blood pressure traits.对 100 多万欧洲血统个体进行全基因组分析,可提高血压特征的多基因风险评分。
Nat Genet. 2024 May;56(5):778-791. doi: 10.1038/s41588-024-01714-w. Epub 2024 Apr 30.
2
Predictors of 1-year drug-related admissions in older multimorbid hospitalized adults.老年多病住院成年人中与药物相关的 1 年入院率的预测因素。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2022 May;70(5):1510-1516. doi: 10.1111/jgs.17667. Epub 2022 Jan 22.
3
Application of machine learning approaches to administrative claims data to predict clinical outcomes in medical and surgical patient populations.
应用机器学习方法于行政索赔数据,以预测医疗和手术患者人群的临床结局。
PLoS One. 2021 Jun 3;16(6):e0252585. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252585. eCollection 2021.
4
Simulating Progression-Free and Overall Survival for First-Line Doublet Chemotherapy With or Without Bevacizumab in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients Based on Real-World Registry Data.基于真实世界注册数据模拟转移性结直肠癌患者一线双联化疗联合或不联合贝伐珠单抗的无进展生存期和总生存期。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2020 Nov;38(11):1263-1275. doi: 10.1007/s40273-020-00951-1.
5
Evaluation of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status of breast cancer using preoperative multidetector computed tomography with deep learning and handcrafted radiomics features.使用术前多排计算机断层扫描结合深度学习和手工制作的影像组学特征评估乳腺癌患者的人表皮生长因子受体2状态
Chin J Cancer Res. 2020 Apr;32(2):175-185. doi: 10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2020.02.05.
6
Multiple Level CT Radiomics Features Preoperatively Predict Lymph Node Metastasis in Esophageal Cancer: A Multicentre Retrospective Study.多层CT影像组学特征术前预测食管癌淋巴结转移:一项多中心回顾性研究
Front Oncol. 2020 Jan 21;9:1548. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2019.01548. eCollection 2019.
7
Development and Validation of a Risk Prediction Model for In-Hospital Mortality Among Patients With Stevens-Johnson Syndrome/Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis-ABCD-10.Stevens-Johnson 综合征/中毒性表皮坏死松解症患者住院死亡率风险预测模型的建立与验证-ABCD-10
JAMA Dermatol. 2019 Apr 1;155(4):448-454. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2018.5605.
8
Dementia Population Risk Tool (DemPoRT): study protocol for a predictive algorithm assessing dementia risk in the community.痴呆症人群风险工具(DemPoRT):一种评估社区痴呆症风险的预测算法的研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2017 Oct 24;7(10):e018018. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018018.
9
Leveraging Electronic Health Care Record Information to Measure Pressure Ulcer Risk in Veterans With Spinal Cord Injury: A Longitudinal Study Protocol.利用电子医疗记录信息评估脊髓损伤退伍军人的压疮风险:一项纵向研究方案。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2017 Jan 19;6(1):e3. doi: 10.2196/resprot.5948.
10
Massive blood transfusion after the first cut in liver transplantation predicts renal outcome and survival.肝移植首次切肝后大量输血可预测肾脏预后及生存情况。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2014 Apr;399(4):429-40. doi: 10.1007/s00423-014-1181-y. Epub 2014 Mar 30.