• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Disk diffusion susceptibility tests: need for laboratory-specific breakpoints.

作者信息

Manninen R, Eerola E, Huovinen P

机构信息

Antimicrobial Research Laboratory, National Public Health Institute, Turku, Finland.

出版信息

Scand J Infect Dis. 1995;27(1):45-9. doi: 10.3109/00365549509018971.

DOI:10.3109/00365549509018971
PMID:7784813
Abstract

Significant changes were observed in the measured resistance levels of Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus when the Biodisk disk susceptibility test method used in 1992 was replaced with another commercial method, Oxoid. For example, when non-species-specific breakpoints were used, the frequency of cephalotin-resistant E. coli was 12% of all isolates in 1992 but only 4% in 1993; the corresponding figures for the intermediately resistant isolates were 84% and 8%. The population distribution histograms were however, practically unchanged. Thus, the resistance percentages apparently did not reflect the real development of resistance. Similar findings were also made for several other antimicrobials. Susceptibility test breakpoints should therefore be examined separately for all bacterial species in each laboratory, and the application of adjusted laboratory-specific breakpoints should be considered. For this purpose, the WHONET computer program provides excellent assistance.

摘要

相似文献

1
Disk diffusion susceptibility tests: need for laboratory-specific breakpoints.
Scand J Infect Dis. 1995;27(1):45-9. doi: 10.3109/00365549509018971.
2
Antimicrobial activities and susceptibility testing considerations of ampicillin, cephalothin, cefaclor, and cefuroxime against invasive isolates of Haemophilus influenzae.氨苄西林、头孢噻吩、头孢克洛和头孢呋辛对流感嗜血杆菌侵袭性分离株的抗菌活性及药敏试验考量
Chemotherapy. 1989;35(2):88-94. doi: 10.1159/000238653.
3
A new method for normalized interpretation of antimicrobial resistance from disk test results for comparative purposes.一种用于对比目的的、从纸片扩散试验结果进行抗菌药物耐药性标准化解读的新方法。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2003 Feb;9(2):120-32. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0691.2003.00546.x.
4
Single-strain regression analysis for quality control of cephalothin-susceptibility testing and determination of interpretive breakpoints.
Acta Pathol Microbiol Immunol Scand B. 1984 Feb;92(1):13-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1699-0463.1984.tb02788.x.
5
Comparative in vitro antimicrobial procedural efficacy for susceptibility of Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coil and Pseudomonas species to chloramphenicol, ciprofloxacin and cefaclor.金黄色葡萄球菌、大肠杆菌和假单胞菌属对氯霉素、环丙沙星和头孢克洛敏感性的体外抗菌程序疗效比较
Br J Biomed Sci. 2008;65(4):178-83. doi: 10.1080/09674845.2008.11732825.
6
Antimicrobial resistance 1979-2009 at Karolinska hospital, Sweden: normalized resistance interpretation during a 30-year follow-up on Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli resistance development.1979-2009 年瑞典卡罗林斯卡医院的抗菌药物耐药性:金黄色葡萄球菌和大肠埃希菌耐药性发展 30 年随访期间的标准化耐药解读。
APMIS. 2010 Sep 1;118(9):621-39. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0463.2010.02660.x.
7
Relative performance of antimicrobial susceptibility assays on clinical Escherichia coli isolates from animals.动物源临床分离大肠埃希菌抗菌药物敏感性检测方法的比较
Vet Microbiol. 2018 Feb;214:56-64. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2017.12.008. Epub 2017 Dec 12.
8
Detecting erythromycin resistance in Streptococcus pyogenes: reliability of the disk diffusion method and the breakpoint susceptibility testing method. Finnish Study Group for Antimicrobial Resistance (FIRE).检测化脓性链球菌对红霉素的耐药性:纸片扩散法和折点药敏试验法的可靠性。芬兰抗菌药物耐药性研究小组(FIRE)。
Scand J Infect Dis. 1995;27(1):52-6. doi: 10.3109/00365549509018972.
9
Analysis of parameters and validation of method for normalized interpretation of antimicrobial resistance.
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2003 Jun;21(6):525-35. doi: 10.1016/s0924-8579(03)00053-0.
10
Antimicrobial resistance surveillance in Escherichia coli by using normalized resistance interpretation.采用标准化耐药性解读方法对大肠杆菌进行抗菌药物耐药性监测。
Vet Microbiol. 2016 Dec 25;197:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2016.10.019. Epub 2016 Oct 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Application of WHONET in the Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance of Uropathogens: A First User Experience from Nepal.WHONET在尿路病原体抗菌药物耐药性监测中的应用:来自尼泊尔的首次用户体验
J Clin Diagn Res. 2013 May;7(5):845-8. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2013/5193.2955. Epub 2013 May 1.