Woolwine J D, Gerberding J L
Department of Medicine, University of California at San Francisco, USA.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1995 Apr;39(4):921-3. doi: 10.1128/AAC.39.4.921.
This study was designed to evaluate the independent effects of various test methods on the activities of antiviral chemical germicides. The activities of germicides against MS2 and phi 6 bacteriophages in a new porcine tissue carrier model were compared to those obtained by four other methods (suspension, glass carrier, tile carrier, and fingerpad tissue carrier tests). After a 1-min contact followed by neutralization (and elution off the carriers), the residual virus in the treated samples was quantified and the amount was compared with that in the saline controls. Antiviral activity was highly dependent on the test method for both viruses and was always greatest in suspension tests and lowest in tissue carrier tests. Results obtained for hydrophilic MS2 with the porcine tissue carrier were comparable to those from fingerpads, but lipophilic phi 6 was subject to spontaneous inactivation on human skin and proved unsuitable for fingerpad testing. These data indicate that the activities of germicides in tests with nonbiological substrates may overestimate antiviral antiseptic activity on skin surfaces. Products intended for use as antiviral antiseptics or hand-washing agents should be evaluated in a tissue carrier system. The porcine tissue carrier model provides a safe, inexpensive, accurate, and reproducible method for testing the activities of antiseptics.
本研究旨在评估各种测试方法对抗病毒化学杀菌剂活性的独立影响。在一种新型猪组织载体模型中,将杀菌剂对MS2和phi 6噬菌体的活性与通过其他四种方法(悬液法、玻璃载体法、瓷砖载体法和指垫组织载体法)获得的活性进行比较。经过1分钟的接触然后中和(并从载体上洗脱)后,对处理后样品中的残留病毒进行定量,并将其数量与生理盐水对照中的数量进行比较。抗病毒活性高度依赖于两种病毒的测试方法,并且在悬液测试中总是最大,而在组织载体测试中最低。用猪组织载体对亲水性MS2获得的结果与指垫获得的结果相当,但亲脂性phi 6在人皮肤上会自发失活,因此证明不适合用于指垫测试。这些数据表明,在非生物基质测试中杀菌剂的活性可能高估了其在皮肤表面的抗病毒防腐活性。用作抗病毒防腐剂或洗手液的产品应在组织载体系统中进行评估。猪组织载体模型为测试防腐剂的活性提供了一种安全、廉价、准确且可重复的方法。