Suppr超能文献

一种酒精类手部消毒剂的抗病毒活性。体外悬液试验与手部及单个指尖体内实验的比较。

Antiviral activity of an alcoholic hand disinfectant. Comparison of the in vitro suspension test with in vivo experiments on hands, and on individual fingertips.

作者信息

Schürmann W, Eggers H J

出版信息

Antiviral Res. 1983 Mar;3(1):25-41. doi: 10.1016/0166-3542(83)90012-8.

Abstract

The inactivation of eleven viruses by a commercial alcoholic hand disinfectant ("Desderman') was tested by three different procedures, viz., in vitro in a standardized suspension test, in vivo on the entire surface of both hands, and in vivo on individual fingertips of a single volunteer. The test protocols were chosen such as to make results comparable. The influence of varying disinfectant/virus volume ratios, serum protein loads, and reaction temperatures was evaluated in vitro, and partly demonstrated in vivo. In some experiments, 5% formaldehyde was included as a reference disinfectant. The experiments support the prevailing concept, that enveloped viruses are considerably more susceptible to alcoholic disinfection than naked ones. Additionally, enveloped viruses were shown to be subject to more "spontaneous' decay on skin. The main result of the study appears to be that the in vitro model predicted a greater effectiveness of the disinfectant than was observed in vivo both in the "hand' test and the "finger' test, although some differences were noted between these tests. Reasons for the lesser in vivo inactivation may lie in the evaporation of the disinfectant with ensuing changes in disinfectant/virus volume ratio, effective temperature, and inactivation time, all shown to influence disinfection. Other mechanisms such as a "sheltering' effect of the skin may have also been operating. The results suggest that, at the present stand of knowledge, in vitro screening tests should be complemented by in vivo tests for the evaluation of antiviral hand disinfectants.

摘要

通过三种不同程序测试了一种市售酒精手部消毒剂(“Desderman”)对11种病毒的灭活效果,即:在标准化悬浮液试验中进行体外测试、在双手整个表面进行体内测试以及在一名志愿者的单个指尖进行体内测试。选择测试方案以便使结果具有可比性。在体外评估了不同消毒剂/病毒体积比、血清蛋白负荷和反应温度的影响,并部分在体内进行了验证。在一些实验中,将5%甲醛作为参考消毒剂。这些实验支持了普遍的观点,即包膜病毒比裸露病毒对酒精消毒更敏感。此外,包膜病毒在皮肤上更容易发生“自发”衰变。该研究的主要结果似乎是,体外模型预测的消毒剂有效性高于在“手部”测试和“手指”测试中观察到的体内有效性,尽管这些测试之间存在一些差异。体内灭活效果较差的原因可能在于消毒剂的蒸发,随之消毒剂/病毒体积比、有效温度和灭活时间发生变化,所有这些都表明会影响消毒效果。其他机制,如皮肤的“保护”作用,也可能在起作用。结果表明,就目前的知识水平而言,体外筛选试验应辅以体内试验,以评估抗病毒手部消毒剂。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验