Miller C S, Mitzel H C
Department of Family Practice, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, USA.
Arch Environ Health. 1995 Mar-Apr;50(2):119-29. doi: 10.1080/00039896.1995.9940889.
One hundred twelve individuals who reported onset of multiple chemical sensitivity following well-documented exposure to either (1) a cholinesterase-inhibiting organophosphate or carbamate pesticide or (2) remodeling of a building completed mail-out/mail-back questionnaires concerning their exposure, symptoms, sensitivity to ingestants and inhalants, utilization of health-care resources, and impact of their illness on lifestyle. It was hypothesized that if multiple chemical sensitivity resulted from neurotoxic exposure, then organophosphate-exposed respondents should report greater severity of illness resulting from the relatively greater neurotoxicity of this class of chemicals. Pesticide-exposed and remodeling-exposed multiple chemical sensitivity groups reported similar patterns of symptoms and identified similar inhalants and ingestants as triggers for their symptoms; these results suggested a common mechanism (biological and/or psychological) for their conditions. The pesticide-exposed group, however, reported significantly greater symptom severity than did the remodeling-exposed group, especially for neuromuscular, affective, airway, gastrointestinal, and cardiac symptoms. These findings provide evidence for (1) a possible biological basis for multiple chemical sensitivity and (2) a distinct pathophysiology or final common pathway for the condition that, while as yet undefined, appears to be shared by these two groups. Although subjective multisystem health complaints characterize both multiple chemical sensitivity and somatoform disorder, features of this multiple chemical sensitivity sample were inconsistent with somatoform disorder, i.e., onset after 30 y of age in 83%, the predominance of severe cognitive symptoms, and attributions of environmental causation. No group differences were found with respect to lifestyle impact. Eighty-one percent of respondents said they had been working full-time at the time they were exposed, yet at the time of the survey (on average, 7.7 y post exposure) only 12.5% were working full-time. The majority said they had quit their jobs, changed jobs, or changed careers because of their illness. Approximately 40% reported that they had consulted 10 or more medical practitioners. The persistent, disabling neuropsychological symptoms reported by these multiple chemical sensitivity groups are strikingly similar to those reported among individuals exposed occupationally to pesticides and solvents. These parallel findings suggest that the types and levels of exposures associated with extermination and remodeling may not be inconsequential, at least for a subset of the population. Further studies from a variety of perspectives, including human challenge studies and the development of animal models, are needed to define the pathophysiological and psychological mechanisms underlying this costly condition.
112名个体报告称,在有充分记录的接触以下两种情况之一后出现了多重化学物质敏感症:(1) 一种抑制胆碱酯酶的有机磷酸酯或氨基甲酸酯类农药;(2) 建筑物改造。他们完成了邮寄/回寄问卷,内容涉及接触情况、症状、对摄入物和吸入物的敏感性、医疗资源的利用以及疾病对生活方式的影响。研究假设,如果多重化学物质敏感症是由神经毒性暴露引起的,那么接触有机磷酸酯的受访者应该报告由于这类化学物质相对较高的神经毒性而导致的更严重的疾病。接触农药和接触建筑物改造的多重化学物质敏感症组报告了相似的症状模式,并确定了相似的吸入物和摄入物作为症状的触发因素;这些结果表明了他们病情的共同机制(生物学和/或心理学)。然而,接触农药的组报告的症状严重程度明显高于接触建筑物改造的组,特别是在神经肌肉、情感、气道、胃肠道和心脏症状方面。这些发现为以下两点提供了证据:(1) 多重化学物质敏感症可能存在生物学基础;(2) 这种病症有独特的病理生理学或最终共同途径,虽然尚未明确,但这两组似乎都有。尽管主观的多系统健康问题是多重化学物质敏感症和躯体形式障碍的共同特征,但这个多重化学物质敏感症样本的特征与躯体形式障碍不一致,即83%的患者在30岁以后发病,严重认知症状占主导,且归因于环境因素。在生活方式影响方面未发现组间差异。81%的受访者表示,他们在接触时全职工作,但在调查时(平均接触后7.7年),只有12.5%的人全职工作。大多数人表示,他们因为疾病辞去了工作、换了工作或改变了职业。约40%的人报告称他们咨询过10名或更多的医生。这些多重化学物质敏感症组报告的持续、致残的神经心理症状与职业接触农药和溶剂的个体报告的症状惊人地相似。这些平行的发现表明,与灭虫和建筑物改造相关的接触类型和水平可能并非无关紧要,至少对一部分人群来说是这样。需要从各种角度进行进一步研究,包括人体激发研究和动物模型的开发,以确定这种代价高昂的病症背后的病理生理和心理机制。