Swaine I L, Emmett J, Murty D, Dickinson C, Dudfield M
School of Health Sciences, University of Sunderland, UK.
Br J Sports Med. 1995 Mar;29(1):57-60. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.29.1.57.
Forty women took part in a study designed to investigate self-selected exercise intensity relative to ventilatory threshold during circuit weight training (CWT) and exercise-to-music (ETM) sessions. Subjects were assigned to one of two groups which were beginners (B) or habitual exercisers (HE) on the basis of their exercise habits. All subjects first underwent a laboratory cycle ergometer test involving a continuous incremental exercise protocol from which ventilatory threshold (VT) was determined using piecewise linear regression analysis. This point was expressed in terms of heart rate (VTHR) and rating of perceived exertion (VTRPE). These points were then compared with those determined during exercise training sessions (TRAHR and TRARPE respectively). The results showed that mean(s.d.) TRARPE (13.5(1.1) was not significantly different to mean(s.d.) VTRPE (12.8(0.5); P > 0.05) but that mean(s.d.) VTHR (134.8(13.5) beats min-1) and TRAHR (154.9(12.0) beats min-1) were different (P < 0.05). Beginners trained at a significantly higher percentage above VTHR than habitual exercisers (118(3.1) versus 111(2.8)% P < 0.05). During CWT the mean(s.d.) TRAHR for beginners (143.2(7.6) beats min-1) was significantly lower than that for habitual exercisers (152.5(10.1) beats min-1; P < 0.05), but not different during ETM (P < 0.05). When these TRAHR values were expressed relative to an estimated maximum heart rate (EMHR) they represented 86.5% in ETM and 80.5% in CWT which were different (P < 0.05). These results suggest that regardless of habitual exercise level and training mode, these women selected a common intensity of effort that was compatible with the described RPE.
40名女性参与了一项研究,该研究旨在调查在循环重量训练(CWT)和随音乐锻炼(ETM)期间,自我选择的运动强度与通气阈值的关系。根据运动习惯,受试者被分为两组,即初学者(B)或经常锻炼者(HE)。所有受试者首先进行了一次实验室自行车测力计测试,测试采用连续递增运动方案,通过分段线性回归分析确定通气阈值(VT)。该点用心率(VTHR)和主观用力程度分级(VTRPE)表示。然后将这些点与运动训练期间确定的点(分别为TRAHR和TRARPE)进行比较。结果显示,平均(标准差)TRARPE(13.5(1.1))与平均(标准差)VTRPE(12.8(0.5))无显著差异(P>0.05),但平均(标准差)VTHR(134.8(13.5)次/分钟)和TRAHR(154.9(12.0)次/分钟)不同(P<0.05)。初学者在高于VTHR的显著更高百分比下训练,高于经常锻炼者(118(3.1)对111(2.8)%,P<0.05)。在CWT期间,初学者的平均(标准差)TRAHR(143.2(7.6)次/分钟)显著低于经常锻炼者(152.5(10.1)次/分钟;P<0.05),但在ETM期间无差异(P>0.05)。当这些TRAHR值相对于估计的最大心率(EMHR)表示时,它们在ETM中占86.5%,在CWT中占80.5%,两者不同(P<0.05)。这些结果表明,无论运动习惯水平和训练模式如何,这些女性选择了与所述RPE相匹配的共同努力强度。