• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

豆类谷物中植酸含量和蛋白质消化率的变异性。

Variability in phytic acid content and protein digestibility of grain legumes.

作者信息

Chitra U, Vimala V, Singh U, Geervani P

机构信息

Department of Foods and Nutrition, Andhra Pradesh Agricultural University, India.

出版信息

Plant Foods Hum Nutr. 1995 Feb;47(2):163-72. doi: 10.1007/BF01089266.

DOI:10.1007/BF01089266
PMID:7792265
Abstract

Several genotypes, number given within parenthesis, of chickpea, pigeonpea, urd bean, mung bean and soybean, differing in seed characteristics were analyzed for phytic acid, in vitro protein digestibility (IVPD), protein, total phosphorus, and seed size. Phytic acid contents and IVPD values differed significantly among and within these species. Phytic acid content (mg/g) was the highest in soybean (36.4) followed by urd bean (13.7), pigeonpea (12.7), mung bean (12.0) and chickpea (9.6). On an average, phytic acid constituted 78.2 percent of the total phosphorus content and this percentage figure was the highest in soybean and the lowest in mung bean. In vitro protein digestibility (IVPD) of pigeonpea and chickpea genotypes varied from 60.4 to 74.4 percent and 65.3 to 79.4 percent, respectively. The IVPD values of genotypes of mung bean, urd bean and soybean ranged from 67.2 to 72.2 percent, 55.7 to 63.3 percent and 62.7 to 71.6 percent, respectively. There was a significant negative correlation between phytic acid and IVPD of these genotypes. Phytic acid was significantly and positively correlated with protein but the magnitude of correlation was very low in chickpea and pigeonpea. Results indicate that the genotypes of pulses with low phytic acid content could be identified and used in breeding program to improve their nutritive value and utilization.

摘要

对几种具有不同种子特性的鹰嘴豆、木豆、绿豆、黑绿豆和大豆的基因型(括号内为编号)进行了植酸、体外蛋白质消化率(IVPD)、蛋白质、总磷和种子大小的分析。这些物种之间以及物种内部的植酸含量和IVPD值存在显著差异。植酸含量(mg/g)在大豆中最高(36.4),其次是黑绿豆(13.7)、木豆(12.7)、绿豆(12.0)和鹰嘴豆(9.6)。平均而言,植酸占总磷含量的78.2%,这一百分比在大豆中最高,在绿豆中最低。木豆和鹰嘴豆基因型的体外蛋白质消化率(IVPD)分别在60.4%至74.4%和65.3%至79.4%之间。绿豆、黑绿豆和大豆基因型的IVPD值分别在67.2%至72.2%、55.7%至63.3%和62.7%至71.6%之间。这些基因型的植酸与IVPD之间存在显著的负相关。植酸与蛋白质显著正相关,但在鹰嘴豆和木豆中相关程度非常低。结果表明,可以鉴定出低植酸含量的豆类基因型,并将其用于育种计划,以提高其营养价值和利用率。

相似文献

1
Variability in phytic acid content and protein digestibility of grain legumes.豆类谷物中植酸含量和蛋白质消化率的变异性。
Plant Foods Hum Nutr. 1995 Feb;47(2):163-72. doi: 10.1007/BF01089266.
2
Phytic acid, in vitro protein digestibility, dietary fiber, and minerals of pulses as influenced by processing methods.加工方法对豆类中植酸、体外蛋白质消化率、膳食纤维和矿物质的影响
Plant Foods Hum Nutr. 1996 Jun;49(4):307-16. doi: 10.1007/BF01091980.
3
Content of antinutrients and in vitro protein digestibility of the African yambean, pigeon and cowpea.非洲木豆、鸽豆和豇豆的抗营养物质含量及体外蛋白质消化率
Plant Foods Hum Nutr. 1995 Oct;48(3):225-33. doi: 10.1007/BF01088444.
4
Effect of domestic processing on the cooking time, nutrients, antinutrients and in vitro protein digestibility of the African yambean (Sphenostylis stenocarpa).国内加工对非洲木豆(Sphenostylis stenocarpa)烹饪时间、营养成分、抗营养因子及体外蛋白质消化率的影响。
Plant Foods Hum Nutr. 1996 Jan;49(1):43-52. doi: 10.1007/BF01092521.
5
Effect of processing methods on the calcium, phosphorus, and phytic acid contents and nutritive utilization of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.).加工方法对鹰嘴豆(Cicer arietinum L.)钙、磷、植酸含量及营养利用率的影响。
J Agric Food Chem. 1999 Jul;47(7):2807-12. doi: 10.1021/jf9808325.
6
Nutritional potential of rice bean (Vigna umbellata): an underutilized legume.水稻小豆的营养潜力:一种被低估的豆类。
J Food Sci. 2013 Jan;78(1):C8-16. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2012.02989.x. Epub 2012 Dec 21.
7
Proximate composition, phytic acid, polyphenols and digestibility (in vitro) of four brown cowpea varieties.四个褐豇豆品种的近似成分、植酸、多酚及(体外)消化率
Int J Food Sci Nutr. 2000 May;51(3):189-93. doi: 10.1080/09637480050029692.
8
Phytic Acid Reduction by Bioprocessing as a Tool To Improve the In Vitro Digestibility of Faba Bean Protein.生物加工降低植酸水平以提高蚕豆蛋白体外消化率的研究
J Agric Food Chem. 2018 Oct 10;66(40):10394-10399. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.8b02948. Epub 2018 Oct 2.
9
Changes in some nutrients of fenugreek (Trigonella Foenum graecum L.) seeds during water boiling.胡芦巴(Trigonella Foenum graecum L.)种子水煮过程中某些营养成分的变化
Plant Foods Hum Nutr. 1990 Oct;40(4):267-74. doi: 10.1007/BF02193850.
10
Effect of roasting and autoclaving on phytic acid content of chickpea.烘焙和高压灭菌对鹰嘴豆植酸含量的影响。
Nahrung. 1989;33(4):345-8. doi: 10.1002/food.19890330416.

引用本文的文献

1
A Review of the Treatments to Reduce Anti-Nutritional Factors and Fluidized Bed Drying of Pulses.减少豆类抗营养因子及流化床干燥处理的综述
Foods. 2025 Feb 17;14(4):681. doi: 10.3390/foods14040681.
2
Nutritional composition, health benefits and bio-active compounds of chickpea ( L.).鹰嘴豆(L.)的营养成分、健康益处及生物活性化合物
Front Nutr. 2023 Sep 28;10:1218468. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2023.1218468. eCollection 2023.
3
Ideotype breeding for crop adaptation to low phosphorus availability on extensive organic farms.在粗放型有机农场中培育作物理想型以适应低磷环境。

本文引用的文献

1
Phytates in legumes and cereals.豆类和谷物中的植酸盐。
Adv Food Res. 1982;28:1-92. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2628(08)60110-x.
2
Protein digestibility (in vitro) of chickpea and blackgram seeds as affected by domestic processing and cooking.鹰嘴豆和黑豆种子的蛋白质消化率(体外)受家庭加工和烹饪的影响。
Plant Foods Hum Nutr. 1989 Jun;39(2):149-54. doi: 10.1007/BF01091894.
Front Plant Sci. 2023 Jul 18;14:1225174. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1225174. eCollection 2023.
4
Integrated breeding approaches to enhance the nutritional quality of food legumes.提高食用豆类营养品质的综合育种方法。
Front Plant Sci. 2022 Sep 7;13:984700. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.984700. eCollection 2022.
5
Understanding G × E Interaction for Nutritional and Antinutritional Factors in a Diverse Panel of (Lam.) Kuntz Germplasm Tested Over the Locations.了解在不同地点测试的多样化扁豆(Lablab purpureus (L.) Sweet)种质中营养和抗营养因子的基因×环境相互作用
Front Plant Sci. 2021 Dec 13;12:766645. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.766645. eCollection 2021.
6
Finger on the Pulse: Pumping Iron into Chickpea.把握脉搏:向鹰嘴豆中注入铁元素。
Front Plant Sci. 2017 Oct 13;8:1755. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.01755. eCollection 2017.
7
The impact of using chickpea flour and dried carp fish powder on pizza quality.使用鹰嘴豆粉和干鲤鱼粉对披萨品质的影响。
PLoS One. 2017 Sep 5;12(9):e0183657. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183657. eCollection 2017.
8
Genetic variability for iron and zinc as well as antinutrients affecting bioavailability in black gram ( (L.) Hepper).黑豆((L.) Hepper)中铁、锌以及影响生物利用率的抗营养因子的遗传变异性。
J Food Sci Technol. 2017 Mar;54(4):1035-1042. doi: 10.1007/s13197-017-2548-1. Epub 2017 Feb 20.
9
The AVRDC - The World Vegetable Center mungbean (Vigna radiata) core and mini core collections.亚洲蔬菜研究与发展中心(世界蔬菜中心)的绿豆核心种质库和微型核心种质库。
BMC Genomics. 2015 Apr 29;16(1):344. doi: 10.1186/s12864-015-1556-7.
10
Horse gram- an underutilized nutraceutical pulse crop: a review.鹰嘴豆——一种未得到充分利用的营养豆类作物:综述
J Food Sci Technol. 2015 May;52(5):2489-99. doi: 10.1007/s13197-014-1312-z. Epub 2014 Mar 25.