Masud T, Jawed S, Doyle D V, Spector T D
Rheumatology Department, Whipps Cross Hospital, London, UK.
Br J Radiol. 1995 Apr;68(808):389-93. doi: 10.1259/0007-1285-68-808-389.
The trabecular pattern of the femoral neck (Singh index) has been used as a measure of osteopenia and fracture risk but the value of this method is controversial. This study assessed the usefulness of the Singh index (SI) by using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) as the "gold standard". 659 Caucasian women (45-70 years) from an age-sex register of a general practice had their femoral neck and lumbar spine bone densities measured by DXA and had antero-posterior hip X-rays performed which were then categorized into six osteopenia grades using the SI method. The intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility of this method was good (kappa = 0.64 and 0.61, respectively). The SI grades correlated significantly with body mass index (r = 0.35) and age (r = 0.17) (p < 0.001). The mean femoral neck and lumbar spine bone densities were significantly higher with increasing SI grade even after adjustment for age and body mass index (p < 0.001). The proportion of subjects below the fracture threshold (2 SD below mean peak bone mass) decreased with increasing SI grade, ranging from 100% in SI grade 2 to 16.8% in SI grade 6. There was, however, wide overlap of bone densities between the grades. Using the criteria "osteoporosis < or = SI grade 4", the sensitivity and specificity of the SI method diagnosing low bone mass was 35.1% and 90.0%, respectively. These data suggest that the SI is a reproducible tool which may detect differences in bone mass between populations or subgroups within populations, although caution should be used in classifying individual patients because of the wide variation in bone density. The method has a low sensitivity but a relatively high specificity in diagnosing low bone mass.
股骨颈的小梁模式(辛格指数)已被用作骨质减少和骨折风险的一种衡量指标,但该方法的价值存在争议。本研究以双能X线吸收法(DXA)作为“金标准”,评估了辛格指数(SI)的实用性。来自一家全科诊所年龄 - 性别登记册的659名白人女性(45 - 70岁)接受了DXA测量其股骨颈和腰椎骨密度,并进行了髋部前后位X线检查,然后使用SI方法将其分为六个骨质减少等级。该方法的观察者内和观察者间的可重复性良好(kappa值分别为0.64和0.61)。SI等级与体重指数(r = 0.35)和年龄(r = 0.17)显著相关(p < 0.001)。即使在对年龄和体重指数进行校正后,随着SI等级的增加,平均股骨颈和腰椎骨密度仍显著升高(p < 0.001)。低于骨折阈值(低于平均峰值骨量2个标准差)的受试者比例随着SI等级的增加而降低,范围从SI等级2的100%到SI等级6的16.8%。然而,各等级之间的骨密度存在广泛重叠。使用“骨质疏松≤SI等级4”的标准,SI方法诊断低骨量的敏感性和特异性分别为35.1%和90.0%。这些数据表明,SI是一种可重复的工具,它可能检测出不同人群或人群中亚组之间的骨量差异,尽管由于骨密度差异较大,在对个体患者进行分类时应谨慎。该方法在诊断低骨量时敏感性较低,但特异性相对较高。