Arend O, Harris A, Sponsel W E, Remky A, Reim M, Wolf S
Augenklinik der Medizinischen Fakultät der RWTH Aachen, Germany.
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1995 Apr;233(4):244-9. doi: 10.1007/BF00183599.
Two different techniques are available for measurement of macular capillary particle velocities. The psychophysical blue field simulation technique gives data on macular leukocyte flow velocities, while the scanning laser technique provides information on capillary blood velocities of hypofluorescent segments in the macular network. Published velocity data differ considerably between the two methods. The current study was undertaken to compare the two measuring techniques in a group of healthy volunteers.
Thirty-two healthy subjects (12 man, 20 women, mean age 27 years) participated in this study. All subjects underwent entoptic leukocyte visualization by means of blue field simulation followed by fluorescein angiography using scanning laser ophthalmoscopy.
The capillary blood velocities measured using the scanning laser technique were significantly higher (P < 0.01) than the flow velocities estimated with the blue field simulation technique (2.68 +/- 0.3 mm/s vs 0.89 +/- 0.2 mm/s). No significant correlation between the flow velocities was found (r = -0.22).
The differences may be related to different measuring locations and/or measurements of different phenomena. The blue field technique estimates average leukocyte flow in the macular network, whereas the scanning laser technique quantifies the velocity of erythrocyte aggregates in the capillary lumen of the para- and perifoveal network. A combination of both techniques may be helpful in interpreting physiological responsiveness and altered velocity pattern in diseased eyes.
有两种不同的技术可用于测量黄斑部毛细血管颗粒速度。心理物理学蓝域模拟技术可得出黄斑部白细胞流速数据,而扫描激光技术可提供黄斑网络中低荧光段毛细血管血流速度的信息。两种方法公布的速度数据差异很大。本研究旨在比较一组健康志愿者中这两种测量技术。
32名健康受试者(12名男性,20名女性,平均年龄27岁)参与了本研究。所有受试者均通过蓝域模拟进行眼内白细胞可视化,随后使用扫描激光检眼镜进行荧光素血管造影。
使用扫描激光技术测量的毛细血管血流速度显著高于用蓝域模拟技术估计的流速(2.68±0.3毫米/秒对0.89±0.2毫米/秒,P<0.01)。未发现流速之间有显著相关性(r = -0.22)。
差异可能与不同的测量位置和/或对不同现象的测量有关。蓝域技术估计黄斑网络中的平均白细胞流速,而扫描激光技术量化旁中心凹和中心凹周围网络毛细血管腔内红细胞聚集体的速度。两种技术的结合可能有助于解释患病眼睛的生理反应性和改变的速度模式。