Confounding and Simpson's paradox.
作者信息
Julious S A, Mullee M A
机构信息
University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital.
出版信息
BMJ. 1994 Dec 3;309(6967):1480-1. doi: 10.1136/bmj.309.6967.1480.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Confounding and Simpson's paradox.混杂因素与辛普森悖论
BMJ. 1994 Dec 3;309(6967):1480-1. doi: 10.1136/bmj.309.6967.1480.
2
Simpson's paradox and experimental research.辛普森悖论与实验研究。
Nurs Res. 2009 Mar-Apr;58(2):123-7. doi: 10.1097/NNR.0b013e318199b517.
3
The Simpson's paradox unraveled.辛普森悖论揭秘。
Int J Epidemiol. 2011 Jun;40(3):780-5. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyr041. Epub 2011 Mar 30.
4
Misleading Epidemiological and Statistical Evidence in the Presence of Simpson's Paradox: An Illustrative Study Using Simulated Scenarios of Observational Study Designs.辛普森悖论存在时的误导性流行病学和统计证据：一项使用观察性研究设计模拟场景的说明性研究
J Med Life. 2020 Jan-Mar;13(1):37-44. doi: 10.25122/jml-2019-0120.
5
The potential for Simpson's paradox in drug utilization studies.药物利用研究中出现辛普森悖论的可能性。
Ann Epidemiol. 1997 Oct;7(7):517-21. doi: 10.1016/s1047-2797(97)00084-7.
6
Simpson's Paradox is suppression, but Lord's Paradox is neither: clarification of and correction to Tu, Gunnell, and Gilthorpe (2008).辛普森悖论属于抑制现象，但洛德悖论并非如此：对图、冈内尔和吉尔索普（2008年）的澄清与修正
Emerg Themes Epidemiol. 2019 Nov 27;16:5. doi: 10.1186/s12982-019-0087-0. eCollection 2019.
7
Simpson's paradox in meta-analysis.荟萃分析中的辛普森悖论。
Epidemiology. 2000 Sep;11(5):613-4. doi: 10.1097/00001648-200009000-00022.
8
Simpson's paradox in psychological science: a practical guide.心理学中的辛普森悖论：实用指南。
Front Psychol. 2013 Aug 12;4:513. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00513. eCollection 2013.
9
Simpson's paradox and the analysis of operating room metrics.辛普森悖论与手术室指标分析
Ann Surg. 2015 Jan;261(1):e9. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000300.
10
Caustics and steroids: a case of Simpson's Paradox.苛性剂与类固醇：一个辛普森悖论的案例。
Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2008 Jun;46(5):487. doi: 10.1080/15563650701610908.
引用本文的文献
1
Statistical methods for assessing treatment effects on ordinal outcomes using observational data.使用观察性数据评估治疗对有序结局影响的统计方法。
Commun Stat Simul Comput. 2025 Apr 14. doi: 10.1080/03610918.2025.2488945.
2
Analysis of subjective well-being in European Union countries: Group DEA and NPE.欧盟国家主观幸福感分析：分组数据包络分析和网络数据包络分析
Front Public Health. 2025 Jul 10;13:1570113. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1570113. eCollection 2025.
3
Simpson's gender-equality paradox.辛普森性别平等悖论。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025 Jun 10;122(23):e2422247122. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2422247122. Epub 2025 Jun 5.
4
Postdischarge Mortality in a Cohort Hospitalized With Anorexia Nervosa.神经性厌食症住院队列的出院后死亡率
Int J Eat Disord. 2024 Dec;57(12):2482-2486. doi: 10.1002/eat.24296. Epub 2024 Sep 26.
5
Heterogeneity between studies can be explained more reliably with individual patient data.研究之间的异质性可以通过个体患者数据更可靠地解释。
Intensive Care Med. 2023 Oct;49(10):1238-1241. doi: 10.1007/s00134-023-07163-z. Epub 2023 Jul 19.
6
Differential Fairness: An Intersectional Framework for Fair AI.差异公平性：公平人工智能的交叉性框架。
Entropy (Basel). 2023 Apr 14;25(4):660. doi: 10.3390/e25040660.
7
Simpson's Paradox in Clinical Research: A Cautionary Tale.临床研究中的辛普森悖论：一则警示故事。
J Clin Med. 2023 Feb 18;12(4):1633. doi: 10.3390/jcm12041633.
8
Causal Confirmation Measures: From Simpson's Paradox to COVID-19.因果关系确认方法：从辛普森悖论到新冠疫情
Entropy (Basel). 2023 Jan 10;25(1):143. doi: 10.3390/e25010143.
9
Aristotle: stratified causal discovery for omics data.亚里士多德：组学数据的分层因果发现。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2022 Jan 15;23(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s12859-021-04521-w.
10
Determining influence, interaction and causality of contrast and sequence effects in objective structured clinical exams.确定客观结构化临床考试中对比和序列效应的影响、相互作用和因果关系。
Med Educ. 2022 Mar;56(3):292-302. doi: 10.1111/medu.14713. Epub 2022 Jan 11.
本文引用的文献
1
Comparison of treatment of renal calculi by open surgery, percutaneous nephrolithotomy, and extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy.开放手术、经皮肾镜取石术和体外冲击波碎石术治疗肾结石的比较。
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1986 Mar 29;292(6524):879-82. doi: 10.1136/bmj.292.6524.879.
2
Psychiatric examples of Simpson's paradox.辛普森悖论的精神病学实例。
Br J Psychiatry. 1979 Jul;135:90-1. doi: 10.1192/bjp.135.1.90b.
Zotero 插件