Hyer L, Braswell L, Albrecht B, Boyd S, Boudewyns P, Talbert S
Veterans Administration Medical Center, Augusta, Georgia.
J Clin Psychol. 1994 Sep;50(5):699-707. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(199409)50:5<699::aid-jclp2270500505>3.0.co;2-c.
The relationship of the NEO-PI to personality disorders was evaluated in a clinical population. Eighty subjects with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) were given this measure, along with the MCMI-II and PTSD and combat scales. Two questions were addressed: (1) What is the relationship of NEO-PI domains and facets to personality disorders?; and (2) What is this scale's relationship to PTSD problems? Results support previous studies that employed a clinical population, but with lower correlation coefficients. For the most part, then, the NEO-PI domains and facets correlated in expected ways with the MCMI-II. On PTSD measures, N accounted for the majority of the variance, but other domains were entered when independent regression equations were calculated to account for different personality disorders.
在临床人群中评估了新版明尼苏达多项人格调查表（NEO-PI）与人格障碍之间的关系。80名创伤后应激障碍（PTSD）患者接受了该测评，同时还接受了米隆临床多轴问卷第二版（MCMI-II）以及PTSD和战斗相关量表的测评。研究探讨了两个问题：（1）NEO-PI的领域和方面与人格障碍之间的关系是什么？（2）该量表与PTSD问题之间的关系是什么？研究结果支持了之前针对临床人群开展的研究，但相关系数较低。总体而言，NEO-PI的领域和方面与MCMI-II呈现出预期的相关性。在PTSD测评中，神经质（N）解释了大部分方差，但在计算用于解释不同人格障碍的独立回归方程时，其他领域也被纳入考虑。
