Engin K, Tupchong L, Waterman F M, Komarnicky L, Mansfield C M, Hussain N, Hoh L L, McFarlane J D, Leeper D B
Department of Radiation Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Jefferson Medical College of Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107.
Int J Hyperthermia. 1994 Sep-Oct;10(5):587-603. doi: 10.3109/02656739409022440.
Extensive recurrences on the chest wall of advanced carcinoma of the breast in 20 patients were treated with multiple field patchwork hyperthermia combined with radiation therapy between 1987-1991. The objective of the study was to evaluate the feasibility, tumour response and complications of treating extensive lesions with multiple, overlapping fields of hyperthermia. All lesions were diffuse encompassing up to 2900 cm2 in area with or without multiple nodules < or = 3 cm deep. All lesions had failed previous therapy with all but three failing previous radiotherapy. Hyperthermia consisted of 282 hyperthermia applicator fields and 357 hyperthermia treatments with external 915 MHz microwaves using commercially available applicators. Hyperthermia applicator fields were defined by the surface 50% SAR distribution of a particular applicator, and hyperthermia fields were abutted to cover the entire tumour bearing area. Radiation therapy consisted of 81 fields to a mean dose of 40 +/- 1 Gy (SE), 88% of fields received between 30 and 50 Gy. The equivalent dose was 42 +/- 1 Gy, based on the linear-quadratic model and alpha/beta = 25 (Fowler 1989). Overlapping hyperthermia fields were separated by an interval of at least three days. Up to four heat sessions per week were required to cover the entire tumour in a rotating fashion. The hyperthermia treatment time was 60 min. Hyperthermia treatments were continued for the duration of radiation therapy. Each hyperthermia applicator field was heated at least once. Patients were exposed to a mean of 14 +/- 3 hyperthermia applicator fields (range of 3-46 fields) and a mean of 18 +/- 3 hyperthermia treatments (range of 6-61) delivered over a mean of 7.5 +/- 0.9 weeks (range of 3-17 weeks). Each field was heated an average of 1.3 times. The tumour complete response rate was 95% with a recurrence rate of 5%. Nevertheless, the mean survival of patients with a complete response was only 10.8 +/- 1.7 months (range of 2-28 months) because of the systemic tumour burden existing outside of the treated fields in these patients. Neither complete response, local control nor survival after thermoradiotherapy correlated with the disease free interval between initial mastectomy and recurrence. There was no evidence of increased thermal damage to skin nor evidence of tumour recurrence at junctions of hyperthermia field overlap. It is concluded that recurrent advanced carcinoma of the breast presenting as extensive, diffuse lesions on the chest wall can be treated as effectively with multiple field patchwork thermoradiotherapy as can nodular lesions treated with single hyperthermia fields.
1987年至1991年间,对20例晚期乳腺癌胸壁广泛复发患者采用多野拼接热疗联合放射治疗。本研究的目的是评估用多个重叠热疗野治疗广泛病变的可行性、肿瘤反应和并发症。所有病变均为弥漫性,面积达2900平方厘米,有或无多个深度≤3厘米的结节。所有病变既往治疗均失败,除3例既往放疗失败外。热疗包括282个热疗施源器野和357次热疗,使用市售施源器采用915 MHz外部微波。热疗施源器野由特定施源器的表面50%比吸收率分布定义,热疗野相互邻接以覆盖整个肿瘤区域。放射治疗包括81个野,平均剂量为40±1 Gy(标准误),88%的野接受30至50 Gy的剂量。根据线性二次模型和α/β = 25(福勒,1989年),等效剂量为42±1 Gy。重叠热疗野间隔至少3天。每周最多需要进行4次热疗,以旋转方式覆盖整个肿瘤。热疗时间为60分钟。热疗持续至放射治疗结束。每个热疗施源器野至少加热一次。患者平均接受14±3个热疗施源器野(范围为3至46个野)和平均18±3次热疗(范围为6至61次),治疗时间平均为7.5±0.9周(范围为3至17周)。每个野平均加热1.3次。肿瘤完全缓解率为95%,复发率为5%。然而,由于这些患者治疗野之外存在全身肿瘤负荷,完全缓解患者的平均生存期仅为10.8±1.7个月(范围为2至28个月)。热放疗后的完全缓解、局部控制或生存期均与初次乳房切除至复发的无病间期无关。没有证据表明皮肤热损伤增加,也没有证据表明热疗野重叠处有肿瘤复发。结论是,表现为胸壁广泛弥漫性病变的复发性晚期乳腺癌,采用多野拼接热放疗与采用单热疗野治疗结节性病变一样有效。