Sidal M, Oğuz F, Unüvar A, Sarbat G, Neyzi O
University of Istanbul, Institute of Child Health, Turkey.
J Trop Pediatr. 1994 Oct;40(5):301-4. doi: 10.1093/tropej/40.5.301.
This study, which aimed to assess the results of three different regimens in the treatment of pneumonia, was carried out at the Pediatric Outpatient Department of Capa Children's Hospital in Istanbul on 151 patients aged between 4 months and 14 years. The first group (n = 46) received co-trimoxazole orally for 10 days and the second group (n = 63) procaine penicillin G in intramuscularly for 10 days. Benzathin penicillin G combined with procaine penicillin G was given to the third group (n = 42) as a single dose intramuscularly. While the best results were obtained with penicillin procaine G, no statistically significant difference was found between this regimen and co-trimoxazole therapy (chi 2 = 0.305023 P = 0.5). We suggest that co-trimoxazole is easy to administer and cost effective in the ambulatory treatment of pneumonia in children.
本研究旨在评估三种不同治疗方案治疗肺炎的效果,该研究在伊斯坦布尔卡帕儿童医院儿科门诊对151例年龄在4个月至14岁之间的患者进行。第一组(n = 46)口服复方新诺明10天,第二组(n = 63)肌肉注射普鲁卡因青霉素G 10天。第三组(n = 42)肌肉注射苄星青霉素G与普鲁卡因青霉素G的联合制剂,为单剂量给药。虽然普鲁卡因青霉素G取得了最佳效果,但该方案与复方新诺明治疗之间未发现统计学上的显著差异(卡方 = 0.305023,P = 0.5)。我们建议,在儿童肺炎的门诊治疗中,复方新诺明易于给药且具有成本效益。