Hagiwara S, Engelke K, Yang S O, Dhillon M S, Guglielmi G, Nelson D L, Genant H K
Department of Radiology, University of California, San Francisco.
J Bone Miner Res. 1994 Sep;9(9):1425-7. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.5650090914.
An ash study was performed to analyze the accuracy of forearm measurements at the one-third site of three dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) systems using 20 cadavers. A Hologic QDR-2000, a Hologic QDR-1000/W, and a Lunar DPX-L system were used. The correlations between ash weight and DXA BMC were excellent for the three instruments (r > 0.97, p < 0.001), with accuracy errors < 5.2%. To perform a forearm cross-calibration of bone mineral content (BMC) and density (BMD) between the scanners, 10 healthy volunteers were additionally scanned at the distal one-third radius. The correlations among the DXA machines were excellent (r > 0.95); the absolute BMC and BMD values were significantly different between the two Hologics and the Lunar machine. The slope and intercept of both the BMC and BMD between the two Hologic systems were close to unity. In conclusion, the DXA forearm software packages provide accurate methods for assessing bone mineral content and density. The conversion of data among different manufacturers should be performed by careful cross-calibration measurements.
使用20具尸体进行了一项骨灰研究,以分析三种双能X线吸收仪(DXA)系统在三分之一部位进行前臂测量的准确性。使用了一台Hologic QDR - 2000、一台Hologic QDR - 1000/W和一台Lunar DPX - L系统。对于这三种仪器,骨灰重量与DXA骨矿含量(BMC)之间的相关性极佳(r > 0.97,p < 0.001),准确误差< 5.2%。为了对各扫描仪之间的骨矿物质含量(BMC)和骨密度(BMD)进行前臂交叉校准,另外对10名健康志愿者的桡骨远端三分之一处进行了扫描。DXA机器之间的相关性极佳(r > 0.95);两台Hologic仪器与Lunar机器之间的绝对BMC和BMD值存在显著差异。两台Hologic系统之间BMC和BMD的斜率和截距接近1。总之,DXA前臂软件包为评估骨矿物质含量和密度提供了准确的方法。不同制造商之间的数据转换应通过仔细的交叉校准测量来进行。