Suppr超能文献

危重症患者分诊共识声明。危重症医学会伦理委员会。

Consensus statement on the triage of critically ill patients. Society of Critical Care Medicine Ethics Committee.

出版信息

JAMA. 1994 Apr 20;271(15):1200-3.

PMID:7818629
Abstract

The demand for medical services such as critical care is likely to often exceed supply. In the setting of these constraining conditions, institutions and individual providers of critical care must use some moral framework for distributing the available resources efficiently and equitably. Guidelines are therefore provided for triage of critically ill patients. There are several general principles that should guide decision making: providers should advocate for patients; members of the provider team should collaborate; care must be restricted in an equitable system; decisions to give care should be based on expected benefit; mechanisms for alternative care should be planned; explicit policies should be written; prior public notification is necessary. Patients who are not expected to benefit from intensive care, such as those with imminently fatal illnesses or permanent unconsciousness, should not be placed in the intensive care unit. Hospitals should assign individuals the responsibility of intensive care triage, and a committee should oversee the performance of this responsibility to facilitate the most efficient and equitable use of intensive care.

摘要

对重症监护等医疗服务的需求很可能经常超过供给。在这些限制性条件下,重症监护机构和个体提供者必须采用某种道德框架来高效且公平地分配可用资源。因此,提供了重症患者分诊指南。有几条应指导决策的一般原则:提供者应为患者代言;提供者团队成员应协作;在公平的体系中必须限制医疗服务;给予医疗服务的决策应基于预期益处;应规划替代医疗服务机制;应制定明确政策;必须事先向公众通报。预计无法从重症监护中获益的患者,如患有即将致命疾病或永久昏迷的患者,不应被安置在重症监护病房。医院应指定专人负责重症监护分诊,并且应由一个委员会监督这项职责的履行,以促进重症监护的最有效和公平使用。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验