Sweeney J D, Holme S, Stromberg R R, Heaton W A
American Red Cross, Mid-Atlantic Region, Norfolk, Virginia.
Transfusion. 1995 Feb;35(2):125-30. doi: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.1995.35295125734.x.
The effect of prestorage filtration on the quality of apheresis platelet concentrates stored for transfusion is undetermined.
Investigation of 11 plateletpheresis components used a concurrent paired-study design. On the day of collection, each component was equally divided into two suspensions; one half was filtered, and the other half was not. Each suspension was stored for 5 days. In vitro testing was performed on the day of collection (Day 0) for cell counts and on Day 5 for measurements of lactate, glucose, blood gases, pH, platelet ATP, hypotonic stress ratio, extent of shape change in response to ADP, tissue necrosis factor alpha, interleukin 8, interleukin 1 alpha, interleukin 1 beta, interleukin 6, and platelet surface glycoproteins by flow cytometry. At the end of the 5-day period, a sample was taken from each of the two suspensions, radiolabeled with either 51Cr or 111In, and transfused concurrently. Posttransfusion samples were drawn for measurements of recovery and platelet survival and for functional assessment of the ex vivo ability of the circulating radiolabeled platelets to aggregate in response to ADP.
The apheresis component had a mean platelet yield of 3.2 +/- 0.4 x 10(11) and a white cell yield ranging from 1 x 10(5) to 1 x 10(8), with a median of 2 x 10(7). Filtration resulted in a platelet loss of approximately 10 percent and a variable 2 to 3 log10 reduction in white cell content. No significant differences between filtered and unfiltered suspensions in paired t tests that would likely have an impact on platelet quality were observed in the in vitro tests. The in vivo recovery and survival were highly similar and not statistically different in filtered and unfiltered paired suspensions: the mean difference was 1.2 +/- 4.0 percent for recovery and 7.0 +/- 15 hours for survival. The functional assessment by aggregation to ADP showed no difference between filtered and unfiltered suspensions. A small decrease in tumor necrosis factor alpha and interleukin 8 was evident in the filtered suspension as compared to levels in the unfiltered suspensions.
Prestorage white cell reduction in apheresis components resulted in WBC reduction by several log10 with no evident adverse effect on platelet viability or function.
储存前过滤对用于输血的单采血小板浓缩物质量的影响尚未确定。
对11份单采血小板成分采用同期配对研究设计。采集当天,将每份成分等分为两份悬液;一份进行过滤,另一份未过滤。每份悬液储存5天。采集当天(第0天)进行细胞计数的体外检测,第5天进行乳酸、葡萄糖、血气、pH值、血小板ATP、低渗应激率、对ADP反应的形状变化程度、肿瘤坏死因子α、白细胞介素8、白细胞介素1α、白细胞介素1β、白细胞介素6以及通过流式细胞术检测血小板表面糖蛋白的测量。在5天期限结束时,从两份悬液中各取一份样本,用51Cr或111In进行放射性标记,然后同时输注。采集输血后样本以测量回收率和血小板存活率,并对循环放射性标记血小板对ADP反应的体外聚集能力进行功能评估。
单采成分的平均血小板产量为3.2±0.4×10(11),白细胞产量范围为1×10(5)至1×10(8),中位数为2×10(7)。过滤导致血小板损失约10%,白细胞含量可变地降低2至3个对数10。在体外检测中,配对t检验显示过滤和未过滤悬液之间没有可能影响血小板质量的显著差异。体内回收率和存活率在过滤和未过滤的配对悬液中高度相似且无统计学差异:回收率的平均差异为1.2±4.0%,存活率的平均差异为7.0±15小时。通过对ADP聚集的功能评估显示过滤和未过滤悬液之间没有差异。与未过滤悬液中的水平相比,过滤悬液中肿瘤坏死因子α和白细胞介素8略有降低。
单采成分储存前白细胞减少导致白细胞减少几个对数10,对血小板活力或功能无明显不良影响。