Vasan R S, Larson M G, Levy D
Framingham Heart Study, Framingham, MA 01701.
Circulation. 1995 Feb 1;91(3):734-40. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.91.3.734.
Previous studies that evaluated the determinants of aortic root size have not yielded uniform results. We examined the relations of age, height, weight, body surface area, sex, and blood pressure to echocardiographically determined aortic root size in a population-based cohort.
The study sample consisted of 1849 men and 2152 women in the Framingham Heart Study and Framingham Offspring Study who were free of clinically apparent cardiac disease when echocardiography was performed. Aortic root measurements were made by M-mode echocardiography using a leading-edge-to-leading-edge technique. The relations of age, height, weight, body surface area, and blood pressure variables (contemporary and those obtained 8 years before) to aortic root dimension were examined by use of sex-specific correlations and linear regression analyses. Age, height, weight, and sex emerged as the principal determinants of aortic root dimensions in adults (cumulative R2 = .2085 in men and .2327 in women). The additional effect of contemporary or previous blood pressure measures was small and revealed direct associations of aortic root dimension with mean arterial and diastolic blood pressures and inverse associations with pulse and systolic blood pressures. Previous blood pressure measurements did not contribute significantly to prediction of aortic root size once contemporary blood pressure variable entered the models. Results of regression analyses using a sex-pooled data set showed that on average, the aortic root measurement in women was 2.4 mm smaller than that of men of comparable age, height, and weight. Logistic regression was used to assess the likelihood of aortic root enlargement according to blood pressure levels. After adjustment for age, height, and weight, the odds ratio of aortic dilation for a 1-SD increment in systolic pressure was 0.70 (95% CI, 0.52 to 0.95) in men and 0.79 (95% CI, 0.60 to 1.04) in women; the odds ratio for a 1-SD increment in diastolic pressure was 1.22 (95% CI, 0.91 to 1.63) in men and 1.33 (95% CI, 1.01 to 1.73) in women.
Age, height, weight, and sex emerged as the principal determinants of aortic root dimensions. The additional influences of blood pressure measurements were small; direct associations of aortic root dimensions with mean arterial and diastolic blood pressures and inverse associations with pulse and systolic blood pressures were observed. Additional prospective studies are needed to confirm these observations and to assess the impact of aortic root dimensions on the incidence of hypertension.
以往评估主动脉根部大小决定因素的研究结果并不一致。我们在一个基于人群的队列中,研究了年龄、身高、体重、体表面积、性别和血压与超声心动图测定的主动脉根部大小之间的关系。
研究样本包括弗雷明汉心脏研究和弗雷明汉后代研究中的1849名男性和2152名女性,这些人在进行超声心动图检查时无明显临床心脏病。主动脉根部测量采用M型超声心动图,使用前沿到前沿技术。通过性别特异性相关性和线性回归分析,研究年龄、身高、体重、体表面积和血压变量(当前和8年前获得的)与主动脉根部尺寸之间的关系。年龄、身高、体重和性别是成年人主动脉根部尺寸的主要决定因素(男性累积R2 = 0.2085,女性累积R2 = 0.2327)。当前或既往血压测量的额外影响较小,显示主动脉根部尺寸与平均动脉压和舒张压呈直接关联,与脉压和收缩压呈负相关。一旦当前血压变量进入模型,既往血压测量对主动脉根部大小预测的贡献并不显著。使用合并性别数据集的回归分析结果显示,平均而言,年龄、身高和体重相当的女性主动脉根部测量值比男性小2.4 mm。采用逻辑回归根据血压水平评估主动脉根部扩大的可能性。在调整年龄、身高和体重后,男性收缩压每增加1个标准差,主动脉扩张的比值比为0.70(95%CI,0.52至0.95),女性为0.79(95%CI,0.60至1.04);男性舒张压每增加1个标准差,比值比为1.22(95%CI,0.91至1.63),女性为1.33(95%CI,1.01至1.73)。
年龄、身高、体重和性别是主动脉根部尺寸的主要决定因素。血压测量的额外影响较小;观察到主动脉根部尺寸与平均动脉压和舒张压呈直接关联,与脉压和收缩压呈负相关。需要更多前瞻性研究来证实这些观察结果,并评估主动脉根部尺寸对高血压发病率的影响。