Kim M, Roman M J, Cavallini M C, Schwartz J E, Pickering T G, Devereux R B
Department of Medicine, New York Hospital-Cornell University Medical Center, New York 10021, USA.
Hypertension. 1996 Jul;28(1):47-52. doi: 10.1161/01.hyp.28.1.47.
Although early reports suggested that hypertension predisposed to aortic root enlargement and consequent aortic regurgitation, more recent pathological and M-mode echocardiographic studies have not found an association between hypertension and aortic enlargement when age is considered. These discrepancies may partially reflect methodological shortcomings in the accuracy and reproducibility of aortic and blood pressure measurements. Therefore, we measured two-dimensional echocardiographic diameters of the aortic root at four locations and compared findings with ambulatory and resting blood pressures and measures of body size in 110 normotensive and 110 hypertensive men and women matched for age and sex. Aortic diameters at the anulus (2.41 +/- 0.29 versus 2.34 +/- 0.24 cm, P = .06) and sinuses (3.47 +/- 0.44 versus 3.37 +/- 0.36 cm, P = .08) were marginally higher, whereas diameters at the supra-aortic ridge (2.94 +/- 0-38 versus 2.81 +/- 0.32 cm, P < .01) and ascending aorta (3.26 +/- 0.45 versus 3.11 +/- 0.32 cm, P < .01) were significantly increased in hypertensive subjects. Aortic diameters increased with increasing quartiles of diastolic and systolic pressures, particularly at the supra-aortic ridge and ascending aorta. In multivariate analyses, blood pressure remained an independent determinant of distal aortic diameters after body size and age were considered. Aortic regurgitation was seen in 5 normotensive and 7 hypertensive subjects and did not differ in severity. Thus, hypertension is associated with a slight increase in aortic root size, most notably of the supra-aortic ridge and proximal ascending aorta. Although dilatation at the commissural attachment might be expected to predispose to an increase in aortic regurgitation, we did not detect such a difference in this population of healthy, asymptomatic individuals.
尽管早期报告表明高血压易导致主动脉根部扩大及随之而来的主动脉反流,但最近的病理学和M型超声心动图研究并未发现考虑年龄因素时高血压与主动脉扩大之间存在关联。这些差异可能部分反映了主动脉和血压测量在准确性和可重复性方面的方法学缺陷。因此,我们测量了110名年龄和性别匹配的血压正常者及110名高血压男性和女性的主动脉根部四个位置的二维超声心动图直径,并将结果与动态和静息血压以及体型测量值进行比较。瓣环处(2.41±0.29对2.34±0.24cm,P = 0.06)和窦部(3.47±0.44对3.37±0.36cm,P = 0.08)的主动脉直径略高,而高血压患者主动脉弓上嵴处(2.94±0.38对2.81±0.32cm,P < 0.01)和升主动脉(3.26±0.45对3.11±0.32cm,P < 0.01)的直径显著增加。主动脉直径随舒张压和收缩压四分位数的增加而增大,尤其是在主动脉弓上嵴和升主动脉处。在多变量分析中,在考虑体型和年龄后,血压仍是远端主动脉直径的独立决定因素。5名血压正常者和7名高血压患者出现主动脉反流,且严重程度无差异。因此,高血压与主动脉根部大小略有增加有关,最明显的是主动脉弓上嵴和升主动脉近端。尽管瓣叶附着处的扩张可能会导致主动脉反流增加,但在这群健康、无症状的个体中我们并未检测到这种差异。