Reichelt S, Sveaass N
Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Blindern, Norway.
Fam Process. 1994 Sep;33(3):247-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1545-5300.1994.00247.x.
This article addresses the question of what is a "good" conversation by analyzing "poor" conversations. During a project on family therapy with refugee families, we often experienced what we labeled as "poor" conversations. We present examples of a variety of such conversations, which we then analyze with reference to therapeutic maps and central concerns of the therapists. We describe four patterns of therapist/client relationships that emerged from this analysis. The main focus of our discussion is to clarify when "poor" conversations may be an important part of the therapeutic process, and when and how they should be avoided. We believe that the issues we raise are central to therapeutic work in general and not just to therapy with refugee families.
本文通过分析“糟糕”的对话来探讨什么是“良好”的对话这一问题。在一个针对难民家庭的家庭治疗项目中，我们经常经历我们所定义的“糟糕”对话。我们呈现了各种此类对话的例子，然后参照治疗图谱和治疗师的核心关注点对其进行分析。我们描述了从这一分析中浮现出的四种治疗师/客户关系模式。我们讨论的主要焦点是阐明“糟糕”对话何时可能是治疗过程的重要组成部分，以及何时以及如何避免它们。我们认为我们提出的问题对于一般治疗工作至关重要，而不仅仅针对难民家庭治疗。
