Derlet R W, Nishio D, Cole L M, Silva J
Division of Emergency Medicine, University of California-Davis, Medical Center, Sacramento 95817.
Am J Emerg Med. 1992 May;10(3):195-9. doi: 10.1016/0735-6757(92)90207-E.
Because of severe emergency department (ED) overcrowding, the authors initiated a program of referring certain patients who were assessed as not needing emergency care away from the ED. A selected group of patients who presented to a busy university ED were refused treatment and triaged away following a medical screening examination performed by a nurse. In this 3-year study 136,794 patients presented to the triage area in the ED, of which 21,069 (15%) were refused care and referred elsewhere. Letters and calls to all referral clinics, eight local EDs, and the coroner's office identified no patients who had been grossly mistriaged, and only insignificant adverse outcomes could be identified. Additional follow-up on 3,740 individuals triaged away was performed by telephone. Responses from this survey indicated that 42% of persons received care elsewhere the same day, 37% within 2 days, and 22% decided not to seek medical care. A group of 1.6% sought care at other hospital EDs for minor complaints. The authors concluded that a group of patients can be selectively triaged out of the ED without significant adverse outcomes, which may offer one approach to the problem of ED overcrowding.
由于急诊科严重拥挤,作者启动了一项计划,将某些经评估不需要急诊护理的患者从急诊科转诊出去。一组到繁忙的大学急诊科就诊的特定患者在接受护士进行的医学筛查检查后被拒绝治疗并分流到其他地方。在这项为期3年的研究中,136,794名患者到急诊科分诊区就诊,其中21,069名(15%)被拒绝治疗并转诊到其他地方。给所有转诊诊所、八家当地急诊科和验尸官办公室写信和打电话,未发现有患者被严重误分诊,仅发现了微不足道的不良后果。通过电话对3740名被分流的人员进行了额外随访。这项调查的结果表明,42%的人在同一天在其他地方接受了治疗,37%的人在2天内接受了治疗,22%的人决定不寻求医疗护理。1.6%的人因轻微不适在其他医院急诊科就诊。作者得出结论,一组患者可以被选择性地从急诊科分流出去,而不会产生重大不良后果,这可能为解决急诊科拥挤问题提供一种方法。