• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Does intrauterine insemination offer an advantage to cervical cap insemination in a donor insemination program?

作者信息

Williams D B, Moley K H, Cholewa C, Odem R R, Willand J, Gast M J

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.

出版信息

Fertil Steril. 1995 Feb;63(2):295-8. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)57358-0.

DOI:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)57358-0
PMID:7843434
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare pregnancy outcome after IUI versus cervical cap insemination in a donor insemination program.

DESIGN

A randomized prospective clinical trial in which patients were alternately inseminated with cryopreserved human semen using either IUI or cervical cap insemination methods.

SETTING

The donor insemination program at Washington University School of Medicine.

PATIENTS

Forty-two women with either isolated male factor or male factor plus corrected ovulatory dysfunction using clomiphene citrate underwent 141 cycles of donor insemination.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Clinical pregnancy rates (PRs) defined as a viable intrauterine gestation > 12 weeks or delivered were compared between groups using the chi 2 test.

RESULTS

Clinical PRs were significantly higher in the IUI group (16.4%) compared with the cervical cap insemination group (5.9%). The spontaneous abortion rates were similar between the IUI (1.4%) and cervical cap insemination groups (4.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest an advantage to IUI over cervical cap insemination in a donor insemination program.

摘要

相似文献

1
Does intrauterine insemination offer an advantage to cervical cap insemination in a donor insemination program?
Fertil Steril. 1995 Feb;63(2):295-8. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)57358-0.
2
Comparison of intracervical, intrauterine, and intratubal techniques for donor insemination.宫颈内、子宫内和输卵管内供体人工授精技术的比较。
Fertil Steril. 1993 Feb;59(2):339-42.
3
Intrauterine insemination with frozen sperm increases pregnancy rates in donor insemination cycles under gonadotropin stimulation.在促性腺激素刺激下,使用冷冻精子进行宫内人工授精可提高供体人工授精周期的妊娠率。
Fertil Steril. 1996 Mar;65(3):620-5. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)58165-5.
4
Intrauterine insemination or intracervical insemination with cryopreserved donor sperm in the natural cycle: a cohort study.自然周期中使用冷冻保存的供体精子进行宫内授精或宫颈内授精:一项队列研究。
Hum Reprod. 2015 Mar;30(3):603-7. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dev004. Epub 2015 Jan 29.
5
Cervical insemination versus intra-uterine insemination of donor sperm for subfertility.供精子宫颈内授精与子宫内授精治疗亚生育力的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Apr 16(2):CD000317. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000317.pub3.
6
Intrauterine insemination outperforms intracervical insemination in a randomized, controlled study with frozen, donor semen.
Fertil Steril. 1992 Mar;57(3):559-64. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)54900-0.
7
A comparison of intrauterine versus intracervical insemination in fertile single women.可育单身女性宫内授精与宫颈内授精的比较
Fertil Steril. 2001 Apr;75(4):656-60. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(00)01782-9.
8
A prospective, randomized, cross-over comparison of two methods of artificial insemination by donor on the incidence of conception: intracervical insemination by straw versus cervical cap.关于两种供体人工授精方法受孕率的前瞻性、随机、交叉比较:细管宫颈内授精与宫颈帽授精。
Hum Reprod. 1997 Sep;12(9):1945-8. doi: 10.1093/humrep/12.9.1945.
9
Intrauterine insemination-ready versus conventional semen cryopreservation for donor insemination: a comparison of retrospective results and a prospective, randomized trial.供精人工授精中宫腔内授精用精液冷冻保存与传统精液冷冻保存的比较:回顾性结果与前瞻性随机试验对比
Fertil Steril. 2001 Jul;76(1):181-5. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(01)01857-x.
10
Randomized controlled trial of cervical cap with intracervical reservoir versus standard intracervical injection to inseminate cryopreserved donor semen.宫颈帽带宫颈内储液器与标准宫颈内注射用于冷冻保存供体精液人工授精的随机对照试验。
Hum Reprod. 1996 Jan;11(1):84-7. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a019044.

引用本文的文献

1
Intrauterine insemination versus intracervical insemination in donor sperm treatment.供精治疗中宫腔内人工授精与宫颈内人工授精的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 25;1(1):CD000317. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000317.pub4.
2
Comparison of the role of cervical and intrauterine insemination techniques on the incidence of multiple pregnancy after artificial insemination with donor sperm.宫颈内授精技术与宫腔内授精技术在供精人工授精后多胎妊娠发生率方面的作用比较。
J Assist Reprod Genet. 1997 May;14(5):250-3. doi: 10.1007/BF02765825.