Matorras R, Gorostiaga A, Diez J, Corcóstegui B, Pijoan J I, Ramón O, Rodriguez-Escudero F J
Pais Vasco University, Hospital of Cruces, Baracaldo, Vizcaya, Spain.
Fertil Steril. 1996 Mar;65(3):620-5. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)58165-5.
To compare the efficacy of IUI donor and pericervical insemination donor in frozen sperm insemination cycles under gonadotropin stimulation.
Couples where infertility was caused by male conditions were randomized into two groups: IUI and pericervical insemination. Semen samples, gonadotropin stimulation, and ovarian monitoring were the same in both groups. One IUI was performed per cycle as against two pericervical inseminations.
The donor insemination program at the Human Reproduction Unit at the Hospital of Cruces, Pais Vasco University.
Eighty-eight women (47 IUI and 41 pericervical insemination) with at least one patent fallopian tube and < 40 years of age.
Intrauterine gestational sac observed by transvaginal ultrasound.
Per woman pregnancy rate (PR) was higher in IUI than in pericervical insemination (65.96% versus 41.46%, odds ratio [OR] = 2.73, confidence interval [CI] = 1.06 to 7.2). Pregnancy rates were always higher in IUI irrespective of woman and husband's status, but statistical significance was not reached in any subgroups analyzed independently. Per cycle PR was also significantly higher in IUI than in pericervical insemination: 24.03% (31/129) versus 11.89% (17/143) (OR = 2.34, CI = 1.17 to 4.71). Moreover, cumulative PR was higher in IUI (86% versus 49.5%) (OR = 6, CI = 1.98 to 18.80).
Per woman and per cycle PRs were significantly higher in IUI.
比较促性腺激素刺激下,宫腔内人工授精(IUI)供精与宫颈周围授精供精在冷冻精液人工授精周期中的疗效。
因男性因素导致不孕的夫妇被随机分为两组:IUI组和宫颈周围授精组。两组的精液样本、促性腺激素刺激及卵巢监测相同。每个周期进行1次IUI,而宫颈周围授精进行2次。
巴斯克大学克鲁塞斯医院人类生殖科的供精人工授精项目。
88名女性(47名接受IUI,41名接受宫颈周围授精),至少有一侧输卵管通畅且年龄<40岁。
经阴道超声观察到的宫内妊娠囊。
IUI组每位女性的妊娠率(PR)高于宫颈周围授精组(65.96%对41.46%,优势比[OR]=2.73,置信区间[CI]=1.06至7.2)。无论女性及丈夫的情况如何,IUI组的妊娠率始终较高,但在独立分析的任何亚组中均未达到统计学显著性。IUI组每个周期的PR也显著高于宫颈周围授精组:24.03%(31/129)对11.89%(17/143)(OR=2.34,CI=1.17至4.71)。此外,IUI组的累积PR更高(86%对49.5%)(OR=6,CI=1.98至18.80)。
IUI组每位女性及每个周期的PR均显著更高。