Suppr超能文献

两种用于脑解剖结构定量的标准化坐标系精度比较:初步结果

Comparison of the precision of two standardized co-ordinate systems for the quantitation of brain anatomy: preliminary results.

作者信息

Sandor T, Tieman J, Ong H T, Moss M B, Jolesz F, Albert M

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02115.

出版信息

Neuroradiology. 1994 Oct;36(7):499-503. doi: 10.1007/BF00593507.

Abstract

We assessed reproducible definition of two standardized co-ordinate systems for intersubject analysis of brain images. The baselines in the two co-ordinate systems were a modification of the canthomeatal (mCM) line and the anterior-posterior commissural (AC-PC) line. Axial spin-echo MR images of four subjects at 1.5T were used. Operator error was computed from the replicate analyses of two operators. The mCM line was determined by the lens of the eye and the internal auditory canal, and the AC-PC line was determined by the intersection of AC and PC with the interhemispheric fissure. Reproducibility of the mCM markers (SD = 0.59 mm) did not differ significantly from that of the AC-PC line (SD = 0.68 mm). The measurement error of the angle of the baseline (delta alpha), however, was more than 7 times as large for the AC-PC line as for the mCM line. An additional error affecting the rostrocaudal rotation of the co-ordinate systems, attributable to the distance between the anatomic markers, was 2.1 and 3.6 degrees (3 mm and 5 mm slice thickness) for the mCM co-ordinate system and 8.2 and 11.0 degrees (3 mm and 5 mm slice thickness) for the AC-PC system. The AC-PC line based co-ordinate system is therefore, less reproducible than the mCM line based system. This could be improved if a combination of axial and sagittal images were used for the definition of the AC-PC line.

摘要

我们评估了用于脑图像受试者间分析的两种标准化坐标系的可重复性定义。这两种坐标系的基线是对眦耳线(mCM)和前后连合线(AC-PC)的修改。使用了4名受试者在1.5T时的轴向自旋回波MR图像。通过两名操作员的重复分析计算操作员误差。mCM线由眼球晶状体和内耳道确定,AC-PC线由AC和PC与大脑纵裂的交点确定。mCM标记的可重复性(标准差=0.59毫米)与AC-PC线的可重复性(标准差=0.68毫米)没有显著差异。然而,基线角度(δα)的测量误差,AC-PC线是mCM线的7倍多。由于解剖标记之间的距离,影响坐标系前后旋转的额外误差,mCM坐标系为2.1度和3.6度(切片厚度3毫米和5毫米),AC-PC系统为8.2度和11.0度(切片厚度3毫米和5毫米)。因此,基于AC-PC线的坐标系比基于mCM线的系统可重复性更低。如果使用轴向和矢状图像的组合来定义AC-PC线,这一点可能会得到改善。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验